Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36525078›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Tele-rehabilitation in voice disorders during the pandemic: a consensus paper from the French Society of Phoniatrics and Laryngology.

Robin Baudouin, Stephane Hans, Marion Guiche, Anais Binet, Marta P Circiu, Lise Crevier-Buchman, Dominique Morsomme, Camille Finck, Paola Rutigliano, Alexandra Rodriguez and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Robin Baudouin *Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4039-4310
Stephane Hans *Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), Paris, France.
Marion GuicheHaute Ecole Condorcet, Saint-Ghislain, Belgium.
Anais BinetHaute Ecole Condorcet, Saint-Ghislain, Belgium.
Marta P CirciuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), Paris, France.
Lise Crevier-BuchmanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), Paris, France.
Dominique MorsommeUniversité de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Camille FinckUniversité de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Paola RutiglianoHaute Ecole Condorcet, Saint-Ghislain, Belgium.
Alexandra RodriguezDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
Nina-Sophie LouvetDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
Johan AlloucheDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, Brussels, Belgium.
Aude Julien-LaferriereDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), Paris, France.
Gregoire Vialatte de PemilleDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), Paris, France.
Laura BousardHaute Ecole Condorcet, Saint-Ghislain, Belgium.
Erwan de MonesDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Sabine CrestaniVoice and Deglutition Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Larrey Hospital, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Antoine GiovanniVoice Unit, AP-HM, La Conception Hospital, Aix University, Marseille, France.
Nadine Gallant *Haute Ecole Condorcet, Saint-Ghislain, Belgium.
Jérôme R Lechien *Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, School of Medicine, UFR Simone Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (Paris Saclay University), Paris, France. Jerome.Lechien@umons.ac.be.
Haute École Provinciale de Hainaut Condorcet · BEUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Pierre · BECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Liège · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRHôpital Larrey · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo establish a consensus protocol for telerehabilitation in speech therapy for voice disorders.

methodsThe study was conducted according to a modified Delphi method. Twenty speech therapist or laryngologist experts of the French Society of Phoniatrics and Laryngology assessed 24 statements of voice telerehabilitation with a 10-point visual analog scale ranging from 1 (totally disagree) to 10 (totally agree). The statements were accepted if more than 80% of the experts rated the item with a score of ≥ 8/10. The statements with ≥ 8/10 score by 60-80% of experts were improved and resubmitted to voting until they were validated or rejected.

resultsThe French Society of Phoniatrics and Laryngology experts validated 10, 6, and 2 statements after the first, second and third voting round, respectively. Seven statements did not reach agreement threshold and were rejected. The validated statements included recommendations for setting (N = 4), medical/speech history (N = 2), subjective voice evaluations (N = 3), objective voice quality measurements (N = 3), and voice rehabilitation (N = 5). The experts agreed for a follow-up consisting of combined telerehabilitation and in-office rehabilitation. The final protocol may be applied in context of pandemic but could be assessed out of pandemic period for patients located in rural regions.

conclusionsThis Delphi study established the first telerehabilitation protocol of the French Society of Phoniatrics and Laryngology for patients with voice disorders. Future controlled studies are needed to assess its feasibility, reliability, and the patient perception about telerehabilitation versus in-office rehabilitation.

Indexed as

OtolaryngologyTelerehabilitationVoice DisordersDelphi TechniqueHumansPandemicsReproducibility of ResultsConsensusCOVID-19GuidelinesHead–neck surgeryLaryngealLarynxOtolaryngologyPandemicRehabilitationSwallowingVoice

Identifiers

PMID36525078
PMCPMC9756705
OpenAlexW4311934887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.