Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36524999›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2022

Benchmark Ab Initio Determination of the Conformers, Proton Affinities, and Gas-Phase Basicities of Cysteine.

András B Nacsa, Gábor Czakó

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

András B NacsaMTA-SZTE Lendület Computational Reaction Dynamics Research Group, Interdisciplinary Excellence Centre and Department of Physical Chemistry and Materials Science, Institute of Chemistry, University of Szeged, Rerrich Béla tér 1, Szeged H-6720, Hungary.
Gábor CzakóMTA-SZTE Lendület Computational Reaction Dynamics Research Group, Interdisciplinary Excellence Centre and Department of Physical Chemistry and Materials Science, Institute of Chemistry, University of Szeged, Rerrich Béla tér 1, Szeged H-6720, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-5136-4777
University of Szeged · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A systematic conformational mapping combined with literature data leads to 85 stable neutral cysteine conformers. The implementation of the same mapping process for the protonated counterparts reveals 21 N-(amino-), 64 O-(carbonyl-), and 37 S-(thiol-)protonated cysteine conformers. Their relative energies and harmonic vibrational frequencies are given at the MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ level of theory. Further benchmark ab initio computations are performed for the 10 lowest-lying neutral and protonated amino acid conformers (for each type) such as CCSD(T)-F12a/cc-pVDZ-F12 geometry optimizations (and frequency computations for cysteine) as well as auxiliary correction computations of the basis set effects up to CCSD(T)-F12b/cc-pVQZ-F12, electron correlation effects up to CCSDT(Q), core correlation effects, second-order Douglass-Kroll relativistic effects, and zero-point energy contributions. Boltzmann-averaged 0 (298.15) K proton affinity and [298.15 K gas-phase basicity] values of cysteine are predicted to be 214.96 (216.39) [208.21], 201.83 (203.55) [194.16], and 193.31 (194.74) [186.40] kcal/mol for N-, O-, and S-protonation, respectively, also considering the previously described auxiliary corrections.

Indexed as

CysteineProtonsMolecular ConformationThermodynamicsCysteineProtons

Identifiers

PMID36524999
PMCPMC9806835
OpenAlexW4311666288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.