Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36524625›Full record

ArticleTopics in stroke rehabilitation2023

Novel clinically-relevant assessment of upper extremity movement using depth sensors.

Rachel Proffitt, Mengxuan Ma, Marjorie Skubic

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Topics in stroke rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. An Algorithm for Activity Recognition and Assessment of Adults Poststroke.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel ProffittDepartment of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Professions, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7357-6495
Mengxuan MaDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, College of Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Marjorie SkubicDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, College of Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
University of Missouri · USUniversity of Missouri Health System · US

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesKL2TR000450 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$8.8M
TREET: Training in Rehabilitation Efficacy and Effectiveness TrialsT32HD064578 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI CLARK, FLORENCE A. · 2011 to 2015
$1.1M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000450NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD064578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor individuals post-stroke, home-based programs are necessary to deliver additional hours of therapy outside of the limited time in the clinic. Virtual reality (VR)-based approaches show modest outcomes in improving client function when delivered in the home. The movement sensors used in these VR-based approaches, such as the Microsoft Kinect® have been validated against gold standards tools but have not been used as an assessment of upper extremity movement quality in the stroke population.

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to explore the use of a movement sensor paired with a VR-based intervention to assess upper extremity movement for individuals post-stroke.

methodsMovement data captured with the Microsoft Kinect® from four separate studies were aggregated for analysis (n = 8 individuals post-stroke, n = 30 individuals without disabilities). For all participants, the skeletal data (x, y, z coordinates for 15 tracked joints) for each game play session were processed in MatLab and movement variables (normalized jerk, movement path ratio, average path sway) were calculated using an OPTICS density-based cluster algorithm.

resultsData from the 30 healthy individuals created a normative baseline for the three kinematic variables. Individuals post-stroke were less efficient and had more jerky movements in both upper extremities as compared to healthy individuals.

conclusionIt is feasible to use a movement sensor paired with a VR-based intervention to quantify and qualify upper extremity movement for individuals post-stroke. Further research with a larger cohort is necessary to establish clinical sensitivity and specificity.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansMovementRecovery of FunctionUpper Extremitycomputer gameskinematicsoccupational therapyStrokeupper extremity

Identifiers

PMID36524625
PMCPMC9758417
OpenAlexW4205630559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.