Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36524560›Full record

ReviewMass spectrometry reviews

Mass spectrometry for metabolomics analysis: Applications in neonatal and cancer screening.

Alexander J Grooms, Benjamin J Burris, Abraham K Badu-Tawiah

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mass spectrometry reviews. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rapid detection of IDH mutations in gliomas by intraoperative mass spectrometry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander J GroomsDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Ohio, Columbus, USA.
Benjamin J BurrisDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Ohio, Columbus, USA.
Abraham K Badu-TawiahDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Ohio, Columbus, USA.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

Malaria Management through an On-demand Diagnostic Approach using Novel Ionic ProbesR01AI143809 · NIAID · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BADU-TAWIAH, ABRAHAM · 2019 to 2023
$1.3M
National Institute of Health RO1-AI-143809NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI143809Sloan Foundation FG-2020-12734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical analysis by analytical instrumentation has played a major role in disease diagnosis, which is a necessary step for disease treatment. While the treatment process often targets specific organs or compounds, the diagnostic step can occur through various means, including physical or chemical examination. Chemically, the genome may be evaluated to give information about potential genetic outcomes, the transcriptome to provide information about expression actively occurring, the proteome to offer insight on functions causing metabolite expression, or the metabolome to provide a picture of both past and ongoing physiological function in the body. Mass spectrometry (MS) has been elevated among other analytical instrumentation because it can be used to evaluate all four biological machineries of the body. In addition, MS provides enhanced sensitivity, selectivity, versatility, and speed for rapid turnaround time, qualities that are important for instance in clinical procedures involving the diagnosis of a pediatric patient in intensive care or a cancer patient undergoing surgery. In this review, we provide a summary of the use of MS to evaluate biomarkers for newborn screening and cancer diagnosis. As many reviews have recently appeared focusing on MS methods and instrumentation for metabolite analysis, we sought to describe the biological basis for many metabolomic and additional omics biomarkers used in newborn screening and how tandem MS methods have recently been applied, in comparison to traditional methods. Similar comparison is done for cancer screening, with emphasis on emerging MS approaches that allow biological fluids, tissues, and breath to be analyzed for the presence of diagnostic metabolites yielding insight for treatment options based on the understanding of prior and current physiological functions of the body.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerMass SpectrometryMetabolomicsNeonatal ScreeningNeoplasmsBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorHumansInfant, NewbornMetabolomeBiomarkersBiomarkers, Tumorcancer diagnosismass spectrometrymetabolomicsnewborn screening

Identifiers

PMID36524560
PMCPMC10272294
OpenAlexW4311621405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.