Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36524310›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Visual Speech Improves Older and Younger Adults' Response Time and Accuracy for Speech Comprehension in Noise.

Julie Beadle, Jeesun Kim, Chris Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julie BeadleThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour, and Development, 6489Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Jeesun KimThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour, and Development, 6489Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Chris DavisThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour, and Development, 6489Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6387-4181

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Past research suggests that older adults expend more cognitive resources when processing visual speech than younger adults. If so, given resource limitations, older adults may not get as large a visual speech benefit as younger ones on a resource-demanding speech processing task. We tested this using a speech comprehension task that required attention across two talkers and a simple response (i.e., the question-and-answer task) and measured response time and accuracy. Specifically, we compared the size of visual speech benefit for older and younger adults. We also examined whether the presence of a visual distractor would reduce the visual speech benefit more for older than younger adults. Twenty-five older adults (12 females,

Indexed as

ComprehensionSpeech PerceptionAgedAge FactorsAgingFemaleHumansReaction TimeSpeechagingspeech comprehensionvisual speech

Identifiers

PMID36524310
PMCPMC9761220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.