Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36524297›Full record

ArticleMicrocirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994)2023

Comparison of laser speckle contrast imaging with laser Doppler perfusion imaging for tissue perfusion measurement.

Goksel Guven, Annemieke Dijkstra, Tjallingius Martijn Kuijper, Nicole Trommel, Margriet Elisabeth van Baar, Arzu Topeli, Can Ince, Cornelis Hendrik van der Vlies

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microcirculation (New York, N.Y. : 1994), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Early peripheral perfusion monitoring in septic shock.European journal of medical research · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Goksel GuvenDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6916-8907
Annemieke DijkstraDepartments of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Tjallingius Martijn KuijperDepartments of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicole TrommelDepartments of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Margriet Elisabeth van BaarAssociation of Dutch Burn Centers, Burn Center, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Arzu TopeliDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Intensive Care, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Can InceDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelis Hendrik van der VliesDepartments of Trauma and Burn Surgery, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maasstad Ziekenhuis · NLErasmus MC · NLHacettepe University · TR

Funding

Dutch Burns FoundationHealth~HollandPPP Allowance
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLaser-based tissue perfusion monitoring techniques have been increasingly used in animal and human research to assess blood flow. However, these techniques use arbitrary units, and knowledge about their comparability is scarce. This study aimed to model the relationship between laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) and laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI), for measuring tissue perfusion over a wide range of blood flux values.

methodsFifteen healthy volunteers (53% female, median age 29 [IQR 22-40] years) were enrolled in this study. We performed iontophoresis with sodium nitroprusside on the forearm to induce regional vasodilation to increase skin blood flux. Besides, a stepwise vascular occlusion was applied on the contralateral upper arm to reduce blood flux. Both techniques were compared using a linear mixed model analysis.

resultsBaseline blood flux values measured by LSCI were 33 ± 6.5 arbitrary unit (AU) (Coefficient of variation [CV] = 20%) and by LDPI 60 ± 11.5 AU (CV = 19%). At the end of the iontophoresis protocol, the regional blood flux increased to 724 ± 412% and 259 ± 87% of baseline measured by LDPI and LSCI, respectively. On the other hand, during the stepwise vascular occlusion test, the blood flux reduced to 212 ± 40% and 412 ± 177% of its baseline at LDPI and LSCI, respectively. A strong correlation was found between the LSCI and LDPI instruments at increased blood flux with respect to baseline skin blood flux; however, the correlation was weak at reduced blood flux with respect to baseline. DISCUSSION: LSCI and LDPI instruments are highly linear for blood flux higher than baseline skin blood flux; however, the correlation decreased for blood flux lower than baseline. This study's findings could be a basis for using LSCI in specific patient populations, such as burn care.

Indexed as

Laser Speckle Contrast ImagingPerfusion ImagingAdultAnimalsBlood Flow VelocityFemaleHumansLaser-Doppler FlowmetryLasersMaleMicrocirculationPerfusionRegional Blood FlowSkinfluxiontophoresislaser Doppler perfusion imaginglaser speckle contrast imagingmicrocirculation

Identifiers

PMID36524297
PMCPMC10078364
OpenAlexW4311665393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.