Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36524232›Full record

ReviewPatient related outcome measures2022

Clinician and Patient Reporting of Symptomatic Adverse Events in Cancer Clinical Trials: Using CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE

Lori M Minasian, Ann O'Mara, Sandra A Mitchell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patient related outcome measures, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Efficacy and safety of Ashwagandha (Journal of medicine and life · 2025
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Patients' perspective in anal cancer.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lori M MinasianDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0472-4079
Ann O'MaraConsultant, ICF, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Sandra A MitchellDivision of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4153-9972

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inclusion of the patient perspective in the reporting of symptomatic adverse events provides different and complementary information to clinician reporting using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE

Indexed as

cancer therapypatient-reported outcomesPatient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse EventsPRO-CTCAEtolerabilitytoxicity

Identifiers

PMID36524232
PMCPMC9744864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.