Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36524098›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022

Preoperative localization of lung nodules: a comparative analysis of hookwire and radio-guided procedures.

Ivan Vollmer, Alfredo Páez-Carpio, David Sánchez-Lorente, Marc Boada, Daniel Martínez, Marcelo Sánchez, Nuria Sánchez-Izquierdo, Marta Tormo-Ratera, Jordi Ribera-Perianes, Sergi Vidal-Sicart and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. CT-guided percutaneous marking of small pulmonary nodules with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ivan VollmerRadiology Department (CDI), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alfredo Páez-CarpioRadiology Department (CDI), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
David Sánchez-LorenteFacultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.
Marc BoadaThoracic Oncology Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Daniel MartínezFacultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.
Marcelo SánchezRadiology Department (CDI), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Nuria Sánchez-IzquierdoNuclear Medicine Department (CDI), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta Tormo-RateraNuclear Medicine Department (CDI), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jordi Ribera-PerianesNuclear Medicine Department (CDI), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Sergi Vidal-Sicart *Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Enrique Carrero-Cardenal *Facultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.
Pilar Paredes *Facultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Histological diagnosis of pulmonary nodules requires surgical resection on many occasions. There are multiple localization strategies each with their own benefits and complications. The objective of this study is to compare preoperative lung nodule localization with hookwire and radiotracer injection (radioguided occult lesion localization, ROLL). To compare results, complications, and volume of the sample resected with both techniques. Methods: Patients undergoing resection of pulmonary nodules with video-assisted thoracoscopy and pre-surgical localization with hookwire or ROLL were studied. Eighty-eight pulmonary nodules were resected in 76 patients: 52 with a hook wire and 36 with a radiotracer. The localization rate, the shortest distance between the nodule and the pleura, the intrapulmonary distance of the locator, the complications, the volume of the resection piece, and the histological result were all assessed. In addition, the factors that influence the volume of the surgical piece were analyzed. Results: All the nodules were resected with both techniques. The intrapulmonary path of the locator is longer for the ROLL group (23.91 Conclusions: Preoperative localization with the ROLL technique is safer than the placement of hookwire. In addition, the ROLL technique shows a tendency to obtain a smaller volume of resected tissue since the marking is not affected by the intrapulmonary route used during marker placement. ROLL technique allows to locate lung nodules with fewer complications than hookwire and probably gets smaller resection samples.

Indexed as

hookwireLung nodulepreoperative localizationradioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL)video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)

Identifiers

PMID36524098
PMCPMC9745529
OpenAlexW4311824993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.