ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022
A clinical risk model for assessing the survival of patients with stage IA-IIA non-small cell lung cancer after surgery.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical overall survival prediction and disease characteristics of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: an integrated analysis based on the SEER and TCGA databases.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- The risk analysis of unplanned tracheal intubation after radical esophagectomy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The nomogram for the prediction of overall survival after surgery in patients in early-stage NSCLC based on SEER database and external validation cohort.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Adjuvant osimertinib therapy guided by ctDNA-assessed MRD in resected EGFR-mutated stage IA-IIA non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized clinical trial study protocol.American journal of cancer research · 2024Article
- Reconsidering N component of cancer staging for T1-2N0-2M0 small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study based on multicenter cohort.Respiratory research · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The survival of patients with stage IA-IIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after surgery is heterogeneous. This study aimed to construct a prognostic risk model to predict the overall survival (OS) of these patients. Methods: Data from patients (n=9,914) from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database were analyzed. The cases were randomly divided into the training and the validation groups. Patients from the Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital (n=270) were also included as an external cohort. Independent significant factors affecting survival in the training cohort were used to construct a nomogram. The precision was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots. The X-tile software was used to confirm the optimal cut-off value to classify the patients. Results: Sex, age at diagnosis, tumor size, visceral pleura invasion (VPI), tumor grade, and the number of examined lymph nodes were deemed independent prognostic factors and were selected to establish the nomogram. The C-indices of the nomogram for predicting OS were 0.671 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.653-0.689] in the training group, and 0.668 (95% CI: 0.650-0.687) and 0.707 (95% CI: 0.651-0.763) in the validation and the testing groups, respectively. The cut-off value of risk points was 106.0, which stratified the patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. The high-risk patients had shorter 5-year OS than low-risk patients (P<0.001). Conclusions: The established nomogram could evaluate the survival in patients with stage IA-IIA NSCLC after surgery and may provide prognostic information for clinicians to make decisions in the management of adjuvant therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.