ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022
Prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Efficacy and patient selection of consolidative thoracic radiotherapy following chemoimmunotherapy in ES-SCLC.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with PDL1 ⩾50% advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, depending on tumor aggressiveness and clinical impact.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025Article
- Classic biphasic pulmonary blastoma: A case report and review of the literature from 2000 to 2022.The clinical respiratory journal · 2023Review
- Exploration of a novel prognostic model based on nomogram in non-small cell lung cancer patients with distant organ metastasis: implications for immunotherapy.Translational lung cancer research · 2023Article
- Assessing the role of colonic and other anatomical sites uptake by [Thoracic cancer · 2023Article
- A new risk score model based on lactate dehydrogenase for predicting prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Multi-Biomarkers Panel in Identifying Benign and Malignant Lung Diseases and Pathological Types of Lung Cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2023Article
- Factors associated with failure to start consolidation durvalumab after definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced NSCLC.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Enhanced CT-based radiomics model to predict natural killer cell infiltration and clinical prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- MTHFR rs1801131 GG Genotype Combined with Serum LDH Level Predicts Lung Adenocarcinoma Susceptibility and Poor Prognosis in Guangxi Zhuang Population.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: At present, although there are some known molecular markers for the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases, but there are still shortcomings in sensitivity and specificity. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is one of the key enzymes involved in malignancy vital glycolytic pathway. Elevated serum LDH levels are reported significantly associated with a poor prognosis in various malignancies. However, there is currently no consensus regarding the prognostic value of LDH in NSCLC patients with brain metastases. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 224 patients diagnosed with lung cancer brain metastases between January 2006 and June 2020 after excluding patients meeting combined with other malignancies and inaccurate clinical information. The LDH cutoff values were obtained using a restricted cubic spline (RCS) model, and the patients were divided into two groups according to the optimal cut-off value (180 U/L). 107 patients with LDH ≤180 (47.77%) and 117 patients with LDH >180 (52.23%) were identified. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors. The overall survival (OS) time was defined as the time from the first diagnosis of brain metastases to the last follow-up or death. Of the included patients, 147 survived and 77 died. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to illustrate the OS difference between the two groups. Finally, sensitivity analysis was employed to evaluate the robustness of the results. Results: The OS rate was significantly lower in the high LDH group versus the low LDH group (P=0.009). The median survival times of the high and low LDH groups were approximately 16 and 33 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that high LDH was associated with a significantly worse OS [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.567; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.058 to 2.32, P=0.025] with adjustment for covariables that P<0.05 in univariate analysis. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the results of this study are robust, despite potential unmeasured confounders. Conclusions: High level of serum LDH indicates poor prognosis for patients with NSCLC brain metastases. This finding may provide useful prognostic information for patients and clinicians to choose more aggressive treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.