Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36524066›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2022

Current landscape of radiation oncology in esophageal cancer: a narrative review.

Jason Liu, Colton Ladbury, Andrew Tam, Joseph Chao, Jae Kim, Heather M McGee, Terence M Williams, Arya Amini, Yi-Jen Chen

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology at City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Colton LadburyDepartment of Radiation Oncology at City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Andrew TamDepartment of Radiation Oncology at City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Joseph ChaoDepartment of Medical Oncology at City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Jae KimDivision of Thoracic Surgery at City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Heather M McGeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology at City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Terence M WilliamsDepartment of Radiation Oncology at City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Arya AminiDepartment of Radiation Oncology at City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Yi-Jen ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology at City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
City Of Hope National Medical Center · US

Funding

Investigating the Role of Radiation-induced Cell Death in Innate Lymphoid Cell Activation within Unique Tumor MicroenvironmentsR00CA256526 · NCI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI MCGEE, HEATHER MICHELLE · 2022 to 2024
$747k
NCI NIH HHS R00 CA256526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Esophageal cancer is an aggressive disease that is the sixth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. The overall treatment paradigm for esophageal cancer has changed considerably over the past decade. This narrative review aims to summarize the current landscape of radiation oncology for esophageal cancer. Methods: A systematic search of the MEDLINE/PubMed database and Clinicaltrials.gov was performed, focusing on studies published within the last 10 years. Our search queried "esophageal cancer [AND] neoadjuvant radiation" as well as "locally advanced esophageal cancer [AND] definitive radiation". Our search resulted in 298 total references. These were manually reviewed, and only 58 references were within our scope of interest ranging from 2012-2022. Key Content and Findings: For resectable esophageal cancer, neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery has been defined as the standard of care over the past decade. In patients with incomplete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation, the benefit of immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting has recently been established. Ongoing studies are examining whether perioperative chemotherapy may be equivalent to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma. For locally advanced esophageal cancer, recent studies have failed to show a benefit with radiation dose escalation in an unselected population, although the use of early positron emission tomography (PET) response to guide dose escalation is currently being studied. Other ongoing studies aiming to improve outcomes in locally advanced esophageal cancer involve using proton beam therapy to reduce toxicity and combining immunotherapy or targeted therapies with chemoradiation to amplify response. Conclusions: Recent advances in radiation oncology may continue to improve outcomes for patients with esophageal cancer.

Indexed as

definitiveesophageal cancerneoadjuvantradiation therapyRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36524066
PMCPMC9745503
OpenAlexW4310812715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.