ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022
Compact automated culture machine for human induced pluripotent stem cell maintenance and differentiation.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteomic Signatures in Extracellular Vesicles as Predictive Markers of Neural and Cardiac Differentiation from Human iPSCs.Mass spectrometry (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Overcoming the Variability of iPSCs in the Manufacturing of Cell-Based Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Machine learning discriminates P2X7-mediated intracellular calcium sparks in human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neural stem cells.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Adipose Stem Cells in Modern-Day Ophthalmology.Clinics and practice · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The technologies used to generate human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) from somatic cells potentially enable the wide application of iPSC-derived differentiated cells in industrial research fields as a replacement for animals. However, as highly trained individuals are required to obtain reproducible results, this approach has limited social implementation. In the research field of iPSC, it is believed that documentable information is not enough for reproducing the quality of the differentiated cells. Therefore, automated culture machines for cell processing should make the starting of iPSC-using researches easier. We developed a programmable all-in-one automated culture machine, with dense and compact constitution that fits within a normal biosafety cabinet (200 mm wide, 233 mm height, and 110 mm depth). This instrument was fabricated using novel x-y-z-axes-rail-system, such as an overhead traveling crane, in a factory, which served as the main handling machinery. This machine enabled stable and efficient expansion of human iPSC under the feeder-free condition, without karyotype alterations, and simultaneously differentiated the cells into various cell types, including cardiomyocytes, hepatocytes, neural progenitors, and keratinocytes. Overall, this machine would facilitate the social implementation of human pluripotent stem cells and contribute to the accumulation of sharable knowledge for the standardization of the entire handling processes of iPSC in pharmaceutical, food, and cosmetic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.