ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2022
Time dependency in the radiofrequency lesion formation for a local impedance guided catheter in an ex vivo experimental model.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility and Safety of High-Power Settings for Electrical Isolation of the Superior Vena Cava Using a Catheter Capable of Local Impedance and Contact Force Monitoring.Journal of arrhythmia · 2026Article
- Impact of baseline-pool local impedance on lesion formation using a local impedance-sensing catheter: Lessons from a porcine experimental model.Journal of arrhythmia · 2025Article
- Pacing and Ablation Technique Using Microelectrode for Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using a Local Impedance-Guided Catheter.Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2025Review
- Does the same lesion index mean the same efficacy and safety profile: influence of the differential power, time, and contact force on the lesion size and steam pops under the same lesion index.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024Article
- Detailed investigation of the lesion formation with a novel contact force sensing catheter with a mesh-shaped irrigation tip.Journal of arrhythmia · 2023Article
- Time dependency in the radiofrequency lesion formation for a local impedance guided catheter in an ex vivo experimental model.Journal of arrhythmia · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The local impedance (LI) is an emerging technology that monitors tissue-catheter coupling during radiofrequency (RF) ablation. The relationships between the LI, RF delivery time, and lesion formation remain unclear. Methods: Using an LI-enabled RF catheter in an ex vivo experimental model, RF lesions were created combined with various steps in the power (40 and 50 W), CF (10 g, 30 g, and 50 g), and time (10s, 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, and 60s at 40 W and 5 s, 10s, 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, and 60s at 50 W). The correlations between the LI drop, lesion size, and RF delivery time were evaluated. The rate of change in the time-dependent gain in the LI, depth, and diameter and the time to reach 90% decay of the peak dY/dT (time to 90% decay) were assessed. Results: The correlation between the LI drop and ablation time revealed non-linear changes. The time to a 90% decay in the LI drop differed depending on the RF ablation setting and was always shorter with the 50 W setting than 40 W setting. The LI drop always correlated with the lesion formation under all ablation power settings. Deeper or wider lesions were predominantly created within the time to 90% decay of the LI drop. Conclusion: The LI drop was useful for predicting lesion sizes. Deeper or wider lesions cannot be obtained with a longer ablation than the 90% decay time of the LI drop. A shorter ablation than the 90% decay time of the LI drop would be preferable for an effective ablation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.