ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2022
Feasibility and safety of interventional electrophysiology and catheter ablation in the South African public sector: Challenges and opportunities for comprehensive cardiac electrophysiology in South Africa.
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Environmental sustainability in cardiovascular practice: current challenges and future directions.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- Feasibility and safety of interventional electrophysiology and catheter ablation in the South African public sector: Challenges and opportunities for comprehensive cardiac electrophysiology in South Africa.Journal of arrhythmia · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The spectrum and outcomes of catheter ablation procedures performed in South Africa are unknown, and therefore, the feasibility of interventional electrophysiology in the South African public sector is undetermined. Methods and Results: This study was a retrospective review of all patients that underwent invasive electrophysiology procedures and catheter ablation at Groote Schuur Hospital (GSH) and the University of Cape Town Private Academic Hospital (UCTPAH) between 01 January 2013 and 31 December 2020.One thousand one hundred eighty-six invasive electrophysiology procedures were performed during the study period. Of these were 1102 catheter ablation procedures. There were 76 redo catheter ablation procedures, predominantly for atrial fibrillation (AF), which accounted for 39% (30/76) of the repeat procedures. There were only 0.8% (9/1102) catheter ablation related complications which were mostly access related. Atrial fibrillation accounted for most of the ablation procedures, 28.9% (318/1102); these were mainly performed at UCTPAH than at GSH, 300 vs 18 Conclusion: A broad spectrum of catheter ablation procedures was performed with a high success rate and limited complications, thus demonstrating the feasibility of safe cardiac electrophysiology and catheter ablation in the South African public sector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.