Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36524030›Full record

ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2022

Feasibility and safety of interventional electrophysiology and catheter ablation in the South African public sector: Challenges and opportunities for comprehensive cardiac electrophysiology in South Africa.

Philasande Mkoko, Nthabiseng Barole, Kayla Solomon, Ashley Chin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Philasande MkokoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Cape Town Observatory South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9452-9412
Nthabiseng BaroleGroote Schuur Hospital, E17 Cardiac Clinic Observatory South Africa.
Kayla SolomonGroote Schuur Hospital, E17 Cardiac Clinic Observatory South Africa.
Ashley ChinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Cape Town Observatory South Africa.
Groote Schuur Hospital · ZAUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: The spectrum and outcomes of catheter ablation procedures performed in South Africa are unknown, and therefore, the feasibility of interventional electrophysiology in the South African public sector is undetermined. Methods and Results: This study was a retrospective review of all patients that underwent invasive electrophysiology procedures and catheter ablation at Groote Schuur Hospital (GSH) and the University of Cape Town Private Academic Hospital (UCTPAH) between 01 January 2013 and 31 December 2020.One thousand one hundred eighty-six invasive electrophysiology procedures were performed during the study period. Of these were 1102 catheter ablation procedures. There were 76 redo catheter ablation procedures, predominantly for atrial fibrillation (AF), which accounted for 39% (30/76) of the repeat procedures. There were only 0.8% (9/1102) catheter ablation related complications which were mostly access related. Atrial fibrillation accounted for most of the ablation procedures, 28.9% (318/1102); these were mainly performed at UCTPAH than at GSH, 300 vs 18 Conclusion: A broad spectrum of catheter ablation procedures was performed with a high success rate and limited complications, thus demonstrating the feasibility of safe cardiac electrophysiology and catheter ablation in the South African public sector.

Indexed as

complications and outcomesinterventional electrophysiologyresource constraint settingssouth African public sector

Identifiers

PMID36524030
PMCPMC9745492
OpenAlexW4296825670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.