Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36524003›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Perioperative outcomes of robotic lobectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients.

Filippo Tommaso Gallina, Riccardo Tajè, Daniele Forcella, Valeria Gennari, Paolo Visca, Federico Pierconti, Cecilia Coccia, Federico Cappuzzo, Isabella Sperduti, Francesco Facciolo and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Filippo Tommaso GallinaThoracic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Riccardo TajèThoracic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Daniele ForcellaThoracic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Valeria GennariThoracic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Paolo ViscaDepartment of Pathology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Federico PiercontiAnesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS- Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Cecilia CocciaAnesthesiology and Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS- Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Federico CappuzzoMedical Oncology 2, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Isabella SperdutiBiostatistics, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Francesco FaccioloThoracic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Enrico MelisThoracic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Minimally invasive surgery has become the standard for the early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The appropriateness of the kind of lung resection for the elderly patients is still debated. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with older than 75 years who underwent robotic lobectomy between May 2016 to June 2022. We selected 103 patients who met the inclusion criteria of the study. The preoperative cardiorespiratory functional evaluations were collected, and the risk of postoperative complications was calculated according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index, the American College of Surgery surgical risk calculator (ACS-NSQIP), EVAD score, and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score. The patients were divided in two groups according to the presence of postoperative complications. Results: Forty-three patients were female, and 72.8% of the total population were former or active smokers. Thirty-five patients reported postoperative complications. The analysis of the two groups showed that the predicted postoperative forced expiratory volumes in the first second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were significantly lower in patients presenting postoperative complications (p=0.04). Moreover, the upstaging rate and the unexpected nodal metastases were higher in the postoperative complication groups. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer is a safe and feasible approach in selected elderly patients. The factors that could predict the complication rate was the predicted postoperative FEV1 and the nodal disease.

Indexed as

elderlymediastinal lymphadenectomyNSCLCpostoperative complicationsrats

Identifiers

PMID36524003
PMCPMC9746612
OpenAlexW4310985515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.