ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Case report: Spontaneous remission of synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers following pregnancy.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Two successful deliveries following fertility-sparing treatment for synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer: a case report and literature review.International cancer conference journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Endometrial cancer is one of the most common malignancies affecting women. It is uncommonly diagnosed in young women, particularly in the absence of abnormal vaginal bleeding symptoms. Case presentation: A 28-year-old woman was referred to our department with lower abdominal pain. Transvaginal ultrasound showed a complex right adnexal mass with mixed echogenicity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) identified a right-sided, torted, cystic solid ovarian mass, and a polypoid lesion in the uterine cavity. Diagnosis: Following multidisciplinary team advice, hysteroscopic transcervical resection of endometrial polypoid mass and laparoscopic right salpingo-oophorectomy was performed. Histopathologic assessment of the endometrial tissue showed changes consistent with grade 1 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, while the right ovarian mass showed a well-differentiated endometrioid carcinoma. Intervention: The patient underwent hormonal treatment and surveillance whilst making a final decision regarding further surgical management. However, the patient stopped hormonal treatment after 2 weeks, went abroad and absconded from treatment for 8 months. On her return, she had conceived naturally and was in the first trimester of pregnancy. Further management was postponed until the patient was 7 weeks postnatal. The patient was not keen on any further surgical management and opted for close surveillance with ultrasound scans and hysteroscopies with endometrial biopsies. All subsequent endometrial biopsies showed normal endometrium, with no evidence of hyperplasia or malignancy. Outcome: To date, the patient remains on a 6-monthly surveillance plan and is considered to have had complete natural remission of her endometrial and ovarian cancers following pregnancy. Conclusion: This unique case demonstrates a natural phenomenon, in which the complete, natural remission of endometrial and ovarian cancers occurred following pregnancy and childbirth. The aetiology may be related to the high progesterone levels occurring in pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.