ArticleCureus2022
Abdominal X-Ray Findings of Patients With Crohn's Disease Presenting With Acute Abdominal Pain.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe primary objective of this study is to describe the most common radiological findings found on abdominal X-rays of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) presenting with acute abdominal pain.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh. Data from CD patients who presented with acute abdominal pain between December 2016 and December 2021 was analyzed. A total of 144 abdominal X-rays met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the study. The medical records of patients who had the X-rays were subsequently reviewed for the presence or absence of follow-up imaging studies.
resultsOf the 144 abdominal X-ray studies, 54 (37.5%) had positive findings, while 90 (62.5%) were unremarkable. The most common category of findings was small bowel findings (32.6%), acute complications (32.6%), followed by extraintestinal findings (2.7%), and colonic findings (1.35%). About 29.2% of the abdominal X-rays had subsequent follow-up imaging done. The multivariate logistic binary regression analysis demonstrated that males had an odds ratio of 2.25 of undergoing follow-up imaging compared to females (p = 0.049).
conclusionThe non-specific findings found on the majority of the abdominal X-rays may indicate that it is of limited diagnostic value in this patient population. However, they play an integral role in ruling out acute complications in CD patients presenting with abdominal pain and exhibiting disease activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.