ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2022
Improved biological dosimetric margin model for different PTV margins with stereotactic body radiation therapy in homogeneous and nonhomogeneous tumor regions.
Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to improve the biological dosimetric margin (BDM) corresponding to different planning target volume (PTV) margins in homogeneous and nonhomogeneous tumor regions using an improved biological conversion factor (BCF) model for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Materials and methods: The PTV margin was 5-20 mm from the clinical target volume. The biologically equivalent dose (BED) was calculated using the linear-quadratic model. The biological parameters were α/β = 10 Gy, and the dose per fraction (DPF) was d = 3-20 Gy/fr. The isocenter was offset at intervals of 1 mm; 95% of the clinical target volume covered more than 90% of the prescribed physical dose, and BED was defined as biological and physical DMs. The BCF formula was defined as a function of the DPF. Results: The difference in the BCF caused by the DPF was within 0.05 for the homogeneous and nonhomogeneous phantoms. In the virtual nonhomogeneous phantom, the data with a PTV margin of 10-20 mm were not significantly different; thus, these were combined to fit the BCF. In the virtual homogeneous phantom, the BCF was fitted to each PTV margin. Conclusions: The current study improved a scheme to estimate the BDM considering the size of the PTV margin and homogeneous and nonhomogeneous regions. This technique is expected to enable BED-based treatment planning using treatment systems based on physical doses for SBRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.