Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36523803›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2022

Setup accuracy and dose attenuation of a wooden immobilization system for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Yuya Nitta, Yoshihiro Ueda, Seiya Murata, Masaru Isono, Shingo Ohira, Akira Masaoka, Shoki Inui, Hayate Washio, Reimi Yoshinaka, Tomohiro Sagawa and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuya NittaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshihiro UedaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Seiya MurataDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Masaru IsonoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Shingo OhiraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Akira MasaokaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Shoki InuiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Hayate WashioDepartment of Radiology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Reimi YoshinakaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Tomohiro SagawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Masayoshi MiyazakiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Teruki TeshimaOsaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka, Japan.
Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases · JPKumamoto Health Science University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the setup error and dose absorption of an immobilization system with a shell and wooden baseplate (SW) for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Materials and methods: Setup errors in 109 patients immobilized with an SW or BodyFix system (BF) were compared. Dose attenuation rates of materials for baseplates were measured with an ion-chamber. Ionization measurements were performed from 90° to 180° gantry angle in 10° increments, with the ball water equivalent phantom placed at the center of the wood and carbon baseplates whose effects on dose distribution were compared using an electron portal imaging device. Results: The ratio for the anterior-posterior, cranial-caudal, and right-left of the cases within 3-mm registered shifts in interfractional setup error were 90.9%, 89.2%, and 97.4% for the SW, and 93.2%, 91.6%, and 98.0% for the BF, respectively. For intrafractional setup error, 98.3%, 97.4%, and 99.1% for the SW and 96.6%, 95.8%, and 98.7% for the BF were within 3-mm registered shifts, respectively. In the center position, the average (minimum/maximum) dose attenuation rates from 90° to 180° for the wooden and carbon baseplates were 0.5 (0.1/2.8)% and 1.0 (-0.1/10.1)% with 6 MV, respectively. The gamma passing rates of 2%/2 mm for the wooden and carbon baseplates were 99.7% and 98.3% (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The immobilization system with an SW is effective for lung SBRT since it is comparable to the BF in setup accuracy. Moreover, the wooden baseplate had lower radiation attenuation rates and affected the dose distribution less than the carbon baseplate.

Indexed as

lung SBRTsetup verificationwooden baseplate

Identifiers

PMID36523803
PMCPMC9746647
OpenAlexW4310864092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.