Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36523787›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Novel oxazolidinones harbor potent

Chenqian Wang, Guirong Wang, Fengmin Huo, Yi Xue, Junnan Jia, Lingling Dong, Liping Zhao, Fen Wang, Hairong Huang, Hongfei Duan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ThePeerJ · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chenqian WangDepartment of Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Guirong WangNational Clinical Laboratory on Tuberculosis, Beijing Key Laboratory on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Fengmin HuoNational Clinical Laboratory on Tuberculosis, Beijing Key Laboratory on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yi XueNational Clinical Laboratory on Tuberculosis, Beijing Key Laboratory on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Junnan JiaNational Clinical Laboratory on Tuberculosis, Beijing Key Laboratory on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lingling DongNational Clinical Laboratory on Tuberculosis, Beijing Key Laboratory on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Liping ZhaoNational Clinical Laboratory on Tuberculosis, Beijing Key Laboratory on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Fen WangNational Clinical Laboratory on Tuberculosis, Beijing Key Laboratory on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hairong HuangNational Clinical Laboratory on Tuberculosis, Beijing Key Laboratory on Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hongfei DuanDepartment of Tuberculosis, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Beijing Chest Hospital · CNCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the Materials and methods: The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of linezolid, tedizolid, sutezolid, delpazolid, and contezolid against 16 mycobacterial reference strains and 69 Results: Tedizolid exhibited the strongest inhibitory activities against the reference strains of both rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) and slowly growing mycobacteria (SGM), among the tested oxazolidinones. In contrast, sutezolid only manifested potent activity against reference strains of SGM. Linezolid, delpazolid, and contezolid were less active against the non-tuberculous mycobacterial references. For the Mtb clinical isolates, the antimicrobial action was ranked as: sutezolid > tedizolid > contezolid and linezolid > delpazolid, whereas no difference between drug-sensitive and multiple drug-resistant isolates was observed. Notably, contezolid demonstrated obviously superior intracellular antimicrobial activity than linezolid. Few strains harbored mutations in Conclusion: Different oxazolidinones can have discrepant antimicrobial activity against different mycobacterial species, or have different manifestations out of cell or in cell. Understanding these differences would be helpful in choosing the appropriate drug in clinical practice.

Indexed as

drug resistanceminimum inhibitory concentrationMycobacterium tuberculosisnon-tuberculous mycobacteriaoxazolidinone

Identifiers

PMID36523787
PMCPMC9745032
OpenAlexW4310206914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.