ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022
A high-efficiency differential expression method for cancer heterogeneity using large-scale single-cell RNA-sequencing data.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current state and future prospects of spatial biology in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Tumor heterogeneity: preclinical models, emerging technologies, and future applications.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease. Tumor heterogeneity limits the efficacy of cancer treatment. Single-cell RNA-sequencing technology (scRNA-seq) is a powerful tool for studying cancer heterogeneity at cellular resolution. The sparsity, heterogeneous diversity, and fast-growing scale of scRNA-seq data pose challenges to the flexibility, accuracy, and computing efficiency of the differential expression (DE) methods. We proposed HEART (high-efficiency and robust test), a statistical combination test that can detect DE genes with various sources of differences beyond mean expression changes. To validate the performance of HEART, we compared HEART and the other six popular DE methods on various simulation datasets with different settings by two simulation data generation mechanisms. HEART had high accuracy (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.