Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36523693›Full record

ReviewCureus2022

Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction: A Review.

Rajeshwaree Bal, Prasad Deshmukh

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rajeshwaree BalCollege of Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND.
Prasad DeshmukhHead and Neck Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Wardha, IND.
Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Eustachian tube is a crucial pneumatic component of the head and neck region and is often neglected as an important site of insidious pathologies. In our literature review, we negotiate the management of eustachian tube dysfunction and explore the various therapeutic and surgical options available at our disposal. We begin by investigating the physiological nature of the eustachian tube and its role in the body's functioning. We also list and elaborate on the various pathologies affecting the Eustachian tube and its associated structures. The review then outlines eustachian tube dysfunction and discusses the pathophysiology involved in the genesis of the condition and its progression. Further, the review explores the tools most commonly used to diagnose or alleviate the condition, including, but not limited to, the Valsalva maneuver, Toynbee maneuver, tympanometry, pressure chamber test, and video nasopharyngoscopy. We also touch on The ETS-7 questionnaire and then on the various surgical interventions that may be used to manipulate the condition. The review also describes conventional tympanostomy and myringotomy, along with more novel techniques such as microwave ablation, laser eustachian tuboplasty, and balloon eustachian tuboplasty. We conclude by establishing the most favorable course of treatment in cases of eustachian tube dysfunction.

Indexed as

eustachian tube anatomyeustachian tube dysfunction improvementeustachian tube dysfunction questionnaireeustachian tube functioneustachian tube pathology

Identifiers

PMID36523693
PMCPMC9745447
OpenAlexW4309043391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.