ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2022
A Deep Learning Segmentation Pipeline for Cardiac T1 Mapping Using MRI Relaxation-based Synthetic Contrast Augmentation.
Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- PRIME 2.0: Proposed Requirements for Cardiovascular Imaging-Related Multimodal-AI Evaluation: An Updated Checklist.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2026Guideline
- AI-Driven Generation of Post-Contrast T1 and ECV Maps from Native T1 Map in Cardiac MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From Promise to Practice: Real-World Readiness of Artificial Intelligence for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Amyloidosis: A State-of-the-Art Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Towards fully automated synthetic ECV quantification: an open-access machine learning-based approach for fast blood draw-free CMR.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A pipeline for developing deep learning prognostic prediction models in cardiac magnetic resonance image analysis.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Standardized Myocardial T1 and T2 Relaxation Times: Defining Age- and Comorbidity-Adjusted Reference Values for Improved CMR-Based Tissue Characterization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Advanced Myocardial MRI Tissue Characterization Combining Contrast Agent-Free T1-Rho Mapping With Fully Automated Analysis.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- Development and performance evaluation of fully automated deep learning-based models for myocardial segmentation on T1 mapping MRI data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To design and evaluate an automated deep learning method for segmentation and analysis of cardiac MRI T1 maps with use of synthetic T1-weighted images for MRI relaxation-based contrast augmentation. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included MRI scans acquired between 2016 and 2019 from 100 patients (mean age ± SD, 55 years ± 13; 72 men) across various clinical abnormalities with use of a modified Look-Locker inversion recovery, or MOLLI, sequence to quantify native T1 (T1 Results: Internal testing showed high myocardial DSC relative to experts (0.81 ± 0.08), which was similar to interobserver DSC (0.81 ± 0.08). Automated segmental measurements strongly correlated with experts (T1 Conclusion: This deep learning method leveraging synthetic contrast augmentation may provide accurate automated T1 and ECV analysis for cardiac MRI data acquired across different abnormalities, centers, scanners, and T1 sequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.