ArticleFrontiers in public health2022
How to promote grass roots medical treatment under China's graded diagnosis and treatment policy? - From the perspective of customer value theory.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal trends in gender, etiology, severity and outcomes of acute pancreatitis in a third-tier Chinese city from 2013 to 2021.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- A Study on the Current Situation and Factors Influencing the General Practice Ability of Clinical Undergraduate Students in China.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- NGOs' initiatives and grassroots approach for accessing to health care services for the slum people in Dhaka.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Based on the background of the implementation of graded diagnosis and treatment policy (GDT) in China, this paper studied the service optimization of primary medical institutions from the perspective of the primary medical treatment rate. Methods: First, the difference-in-difference (DID) empirical strategy is used to analyze the impact of the implementation of the GDT on the improvement of the primary medical attendance rate, and the parallel trend test and the placebo test were used to test the robustness to illustrate the necessity of policy implementation. Second, combined with customer value theory, this paper used a logistic regression model to study the impact of customer value perception on grassroots medical care. Results: The implementation of the GDT can indeed improve the rate of primary care ( Conclusion: This paper fills the gaps in existing research, including empirical research on the grassroots medical treatment behavior of the masses under GDT and the impact of value perception on grassroots medical behavior. Furthermore, the recommendations are made for primary care institutions based on the results of the analysis, which promote the advancement of primary care services in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.