Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36523414›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2022

Preferences of health care workers using tongue swabs for tuberculosis diagnosis during COVID-19.

Renée Codsi, Nicole A Errett, Angelique K Luabeya, Mark Hatherill, Adrienne E Shapiro, Katherine A Lochner, Alexandria R Vingino, Marlena J Kohn, Gerard A Cangelosi

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Renée CodsiDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Nicole A ErrettDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Angelique K LuabeyaSouth African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative (SATVI), Institute of Infectious Disease & Molecular Medicine and Division of Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Mark HatherillSouth African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative (SATVI), Institute of Infectious Disease & Molecular Medicine and Division of Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Adrienne E ShapiroDepartments of Global Health and Medicine (Infectious Diseases) University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Katherine A LochnerDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Alexandria R VinginoDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Marlena J KohnDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Gerard A CangelosiDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

The Center for Innovation in Point-of-Care Technologies for HIV/AIDS atNorthwestern University (C-THAN) Supplemental RequestU54EB027049 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI Chad J Achenbach · 2018 to 2026
$24.0M
Novel clinic-based TB diagnostics and testing algorithms for persons with HIVK23AI140918 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SHAPIRO, ADRIENNE E · 2019 to 2024
$937k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI140918NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB027049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare workers (HCW) who come into contact with tuberculosis (TB) patients are at elevated risk of TB infection and disease. The collection and handling of sputum samples for TB diagnosis poses exposure risks to HCW, particularly in settings where aerosol containment is limited. An alternative sample collection method, tongue swabbing, was designed to help mitigate this risk, and is under evaluation in multiple settings. This study assessed risk perceptions among South African HCW who used tongue swabbing in TB diagnostic research during the COVID-19 pandemic. We characterized their context-specific preferences as well as the facilitators and barriers of tongue swab use in clinical and community settings. Participants (n=18) were HCW with experience using experimental tongue swabbing methods at the South African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative (SATVI). We used key informant semi-structured interviews to assess attitudes toward two tongue swab strategies: Provider-collected swabbing (PS) and supervised self-swabbing (SSS). Responses from these interviews were analyzed by rapid qualitative analysis and thematic analysis methods. Facilitators included aversion to sputum (PS and SSS), perceived safety of the method (SSS), and educational resources to train patients (SSS). Barriers included cultural stigmas, as well as personal security and control of their work environment when collecting swabs in community settings. COVID-19 risk perception was a significant barrier to the PS method. Motivators for HCW use of tongue swabbing differed substantially by use case, and whether the HCW has the authority and agency to implement safety precautions in specific settings. These findings point to a need for contextually specific educational resources to enhance safety of and adherence to the SSS collection method.

Identifiers

PMID36523414
PMCPMC9753790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.