Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36523269›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2022

Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for assessing Huntington disease onset and severity.

Nicholas S Caron, Arsalan S Haqqani, Akshdeep Sandhu, Amirah E Aly, Hailey Findlay Black, Jeffrey N Bone, Jodi L McBride, Abedelnasser Abulrob, Danica Stanimirovic, Blair R Leavitt and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fluid and Imaging Biomarkers in Huntington's Disease.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Engulfment by brain macrophages in a short-lived vertebrate.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The complement system in neurodegenerative diseases.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicholas S CaronCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3877-455X
Arsalan S HaqqaniHuman Health Therapeutics Research Centre, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada.
Akshdeep SandhuBC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5194-7892
Amirah E AlyCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada.
Hailey Findlay BlackCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada.
Jeffrey N BoneBC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada.
Jodi L McBrideDivision of Neuroscience, Oregon National Primate Research Center, Beaverton, OR 97006, USA.
Abedelnasser AbulrobHuman Health Therapeutics Research Centre, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada.
Danica StanimirovicHuman Health Therapeutics Research Centre, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON K1A 0R6, Canada.
Blair R LeavittCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada.
Michael R HaydenCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CANational Research Council Canada · CAOregon National Primate Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of molecular biomarkers in CSF from individuals affected by Huntington disease may help improve predictions of disease onset, better define disease progression and could facilitate the evaluation of potential therapies. The primary objective of our study was to investigate novel CSF protein candidates and replicate previously reported protein biomarker changes in CSF from Huntington disease mutation carriers and healthy controls. Our secondary objective was to compare the discriminatory potential of individual protein analytes and combinations of CSF protein markers for stratifying individuals based on the severity of Huntington disease. We conducted a hypothesis-driven analysis of 26 pre-specified protein analytes in CSF from 16 manifest Huntington disease subjects, eight premanifest Huntington disease mutation carriers and eight healthy control individuals using parallel-reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. In addition to reproducing reported changes in previously investigated CSF biomarkers (NEFL, PDYN, and PENK), we also identified novel exploratory CSF proteins (C1QB, CNR1, GNAL, IDO1, IGF2, and PPP1R1B) whose levels were altered in Huntington disease mutation carriers and/or across stages of disease. Moreover, we report strong associations of select CSF proteins with clinical measures of disease severity in manifest Huntington disease subjects (C1QB, CNR1, NEFL, PDYN, PPP1R1B, and TTR) and with years to predicted disease onset in premanifest Huntington disease mutation carriers (ALB, C4B, CTSD, IGHG1, and TTR). Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we identified PENK as being the most discriminant CSF protein for stratifying Huntington disease mutation carriers from controls. We also identified exploratory multi-marker CSF protein panels that improved discrimination of premanifest Huntington disease mutation carriers from controls (PENK, ALB and NEFL), early/mid-stage Huntington disease from premanifest mutation carriers (PPP1R1B, TTR, CHI3L1, and CTSD), and late-stage from early/mid-stage Huntington disease (CNR1, PPP1R1B, BDNF, APOE, and IGHG1) compared with individual CSF proteins. In this study, we demonstrate that combinations of CSF proteins can outperform individual markers for stratifying individuals based on Huntington disease mutation status and disease severity. Moreover, we define exploratory multi-marker CSF protein panels that, if validated, may be used to improve the accuracy of disease-onset predictions, complement existing clinical and imaging biomarkers for monitoring the severity of Huntington disease, and potentially for assessing therapeutic response in clinical trials. Additional studies with CSF collected from larger cohorts of Huntington disease mutation carriers are needed to replicate these exploratory findings.

Indexed as

biomarkersCSFHuntington diseaseneurofilament lightproenkephalin

Identifiers

PMID36523269
PMCPMC9746690
OpenAlexW4310055676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.