Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36523248›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Prospective multicentre randomised controlled trial of the effect of

Saksham Gupta, Kai Brown, Natalie Lott, Rosemary Carroll, David Burnett, Mehrdad Nikfarjam

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Saksham GuptaDepartment of Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia saksham_gupta@live.com.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6693-2818
Kai BrownDepartment of Surgery, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
Natalie LottDepartment of Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Rosemary CarrollDepartment of Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
David BurnettDepartment of Surgery, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.
Mehrdad NikfarjamDepartment of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
John Hunter Hospital · AUPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite advances in achieving low mortality rates with pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), morbidity remains high. A key contributor to this morbidity is delayed gastric emptying (DGE) occurring with an incidence of up to 30%. The utility of a Braun enteroenterostomy (BE) appears promising to reducing the incidence of DGE, but current research is not definitive. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This project will be designed as a prospective multicentre randomised controlled blinded study to assess how BE effects the rate of DGE after PD in the setting of malignancy, within Australia-with blinding of patients, outcome assessors and data analysts. Patients will be randomly assigned to PD with Billroth II reconstruction with BE versus PD with Billroth II reconstruction without BE. The primary outcome is the incidence of DGE as defined by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. Secondary outcomes will include length of hospital stay, postoperative pancreatic fistula incidence, development of major complications (Clavien-Dindo≥3 a), quality of life and 90-day mortality.The study will be powered at 80% to detect a reduction in DGE rate from 30% to 15%, requiring a total of 264 study participants. An interim analysis will be performed once a total of 104 study participants have been recruited at which point the study will be able to detect reduction in DGE from 30% to 10% with 80% power. Statistical analysis will be done with intention-to-treat principles. The proportion of patients suffering DGE will be compared between treatment arms using a χ ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been ethically approved by the Hunter New England Human Research Ethics Committee (2021/ETH11939), with results disseminated through presentation and publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRN12622000048785.

Indexed as

GastroparesisPancreaticoduodenectomyGastric EmptyingHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicNerve Tissue ProteinsPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeBERPNerve Tissue Proteinsgastrointestinal tumoursmotility disorderspancreatic surgery

Identifiers

PMID36523248
PMCPMC9748957
OpenAlexW4311223500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.