Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36523245›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and uptake in rural Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study.

Feby Savira, Sheikh M Alif, Afsana Afroz, Bodrun Naher Siddiquea, Aishwarya Shetty, Hasina Akhter Chowdhury, Oashe Bhattacharya, Mohammad Rocky Khan Chowdhury, Md Shariful Islam, Liaquat Ali and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Feby SaviraDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0383-812X
Sheikh M AlifSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Afsana AfrozSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Bodrun Naher SiddiqueaSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Aishwarya ShettySchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Hasina Akhter ChowdhurySchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Oashe BhattacharyaSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mohammad Rocky Khan ChowdhuryDepartment of Public Health, First Capital University of Bangladesh, Chuadanga, Bangladesh.
Md Shariful IslamDepartment of Public Health, First Capital University of Bangladesh, Chuadanga, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-9776-790X
Liaquat AliPothikrit Institute of Health Studies, Bangladesh University of Health Sciences, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Baki BillahSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia baki.billah@monash.edu.
Monash University · AUBangladesh University of Health Sciences · BDDeakin University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the acceptance and uptake of COVID-19 vaccines in rural Bangladesh.

designThis was a cross-sectional study conducted between June and November 2021.

settingThis study was conducted in rural Bangladesh.

participantsPeople older than 18 years of age, not pregnant and no history of surgery for the last 3 months were eligible to participate. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The primary outcomes were proportions of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and roll-out participation among the rural population. The secondary outcome was identification of correlates which contributed to COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and roll-out participation. Χ

resultsA total of 1603 participants were enrolled. The overall COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was very high (1521/1601, 95%), and half of the participants received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Majority of participants wanted to keep others safe (89%) and agreed to the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines (88%). To fulfil the requirement of online registration for the vaccine at the time, 62% of participants had to visit an internet café and only 31% downloaded the app. Over half (54%) of participants were unaware of countries they knew and trust to produce the COVID-19 vaccine. Increased age, being housewives, underweight and undergraduate education level were associated with vaccine acceptance, while being female, increased age and being overweight/obese were associated with vaccine uptake. Trust in the health department and practical knowledge regarding COVID-19 vaccines were positively associated with both vaccine acceptance and uptake.

conclusionThis study found a very high COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in rural Bangladesh. Policymakers should support interventions aimed at increasing vaccine and general health literacy and ensure ongoing vaccine supply and improvement of infrastructure in rural areas.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesBangladeshCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePregnancyRural PopulationVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19epidemiologyhealth policypublic health

Identifiers

PMID36523245
PMCPMC9748515
OpenAlexW4311218480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.