ArticleBMJ open2022
Only eye study 3 (OnES 3): a qualitative study into how surgeons approach surgery in patients with only one seeing eye.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Surgical Salvage to Blindness Prevention: A Real-World Study of Intraocular Surgery in Monocular Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Mapping vision loss of patients in a glaucoma backlog following the COVID-19 pandemic: a real-world analysis using the Glauc-Strat-Fast risk stratification tool.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePerforming surgery on an 'only eye' patient is considered high stakes. The purpose of this study is to explore the process of only eye surgery from the perspective of ophthalmic surgeons and improve both patient and surgeon experience. DESIGN, SETTING AND
participantsA cohort of 76 Australian consultant ophthalmologists, divided into three focus groups, were recruited via online webinar to participate in a guided focus group discussion about only eye surgery. Qualitative data regarding participant experience of performing only eye surgery were collected in audio and text form. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify patterns in the data.
main outcome measureIdentification of themes relevant to only eye surgery.
resultsFive overarching themes relevant to only eye surgery were identified: (1) differences in the surgical decision-making process; (2) differences in the approach to consent, (3) implementation of additional risk reduction strategies, (4) value of having colleagues to discuss and plan surgery with and (5) psychological challenges. A divergent theme was identified: (6) that all surgery, only eye or not, should be treated the same.
conclusionsThis study identifies challenges associated with clinical management of only eye patients across their surgical journey. A conceptual framework to guide surgeons when managing only eye patients is provided which has potential to promote a more unified approach to treating this high-stakes cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.