Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36523214›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Factors influencing the information behaviour of doctors and nurses in South Africa's Eastern Cape, Mpumalanga, Limpopo and Northern Cape provinces: a survey study protocol.

Nombulelo Chitha, Sikhumbuzo A Mabunda, Vivien Essel, Itumeleng Funani, Lizo Godlimpi, Buyiswa Swartbooi, Onke Mnyaka, Jahman Thabede, Ruth Tshabalala, Wezile Chitha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nombulelo ChithaKnowledge Management for Public Health Research unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa buli.chitha@gmail.com.
Sikhumbuzo A MabundaSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9458-3742
Vivien EsselHealth System Enablement & Innovation unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
Itumeleng FunaniHealth System Enablement & Innovation unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
Lizo GodlimpiDepartment of Public Health, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, Eastern Cape, South Africa.
Buyiswa SwartbooiHealth System Enablement & Innovation unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4536-1710
Onke MnyakaHealth System Enablement & Innovation unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1834-6136
Jahman ThabedeKnowledge Management for Public Health Research unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-9779-5633
Ruth TshabalalaKnowledge Management for Public Health Research unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-4427-1921
Wezile ChithaHealth System Enablement & Innovation unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInformation is a prerequisite for quality healthcare service. Health professionals play a key role in the health system as they jointly have the responsibility of looking after patients everyday. Failure to use evidence in medicine may lead to medical errors such as incorrect diagnosis and/or mismanagement. Health professionals with access to quality health information can improve health services. This study focuses on the information behaviour of doctors and nurses whose role involves direct patient care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will employ a quantitative approach using a cross-sectional survey design. Simple random sampling will be used to identify the provinces and hospitals. Stratified random sampling will be used to select doctors and nurses to whom a validated questionnaire will be administered. The study will use a structured self-administered questionnaire. Data collection will be carried out at Nelson Mandela Academic Hospital, Witbank Hospital, Pietersburg Hospital and Robert Mangaliso Hospital, respectively. Questionnaires are distributed to health professionals in one of two ways. First, by emailing an editable Microsoft word document (questionnaire) to the health professionals to complete and send back. Second, by sharing with the health professionals through WhatsApp or email, an online version of the questionnaire that has been created on Google Forms. Data collection process is scheduled to commence on 14 March 2022 and is expected to end on the 15 September 2022. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the University of the Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee (reference: M211013) and Walter Sisulu University Human Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee (reference: 099/2021). Permission to access the health facilities was approved by the Provincial Health Research Committees of the Eastern Cape, Limpopo, Mpumalanga and Northern Cape. Finally, results will be shared with all key stakeholders, including hospital management, clinical staff, through public presentation and direct engagements with stakeholders.

Indexed as

Health ServicesNursesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSouth AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesMEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAININGPUBLIC HEALTHQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID36523214
PMCPMC9748927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.