Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36523199›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2024

Four-dimensional digital subtraction angiography for the vascular anatomical diagnosis of dural arteriovenous malformation: Comparison with the conventional method.

Kojiro Ishikawa, Masahiro Nishihori, Takashi Izumi, Ryosuke Oshima, Takeshi Uemura, Fumiaki Kanamori, Kenji Uda, Kinya Yokoyama, Yoshio Araki, Ryuta Saito

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kojiro IshikawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8841-1717
Masahiro NishihoriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1645-0738
Takashi IzumiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Ryosuke OshimaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Takeshi UemuraDepartment of Radiological Technology, Nagoya University Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Fumiaki KanamoriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Kenji UdaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Kinya YokoyamaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoshio ArakiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Ryuta SaitoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Nagoya University · JPNagoya University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTwo-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (2D-DSA) and conventional three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (3D-DSA) are used for the detailed analysis of dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF). Recently, four-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (4D-DSA), a novel technology, has been attracting attention. The current study aimed to evaluate the capability of 4D-DSA in assessing anatomical angioarchitecture in DAVF.

methodsIn total, 10 consecutive patients with DAVF who underwent 3D-DSA and 4D-DSA at a single institution were included in the analysis. Initially, one-slice multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) images obtained via 4D-DSA and 3D-DSA were compared to investigate the visibility of the feeding artery, fistulous point, and draining vein. Next, 4D-DSA images alone were compared and evaluated with and the MPR images of conventional 3D-DSA in terms of diagnosis of the angioarchitecture.

resultsIn total, six men and four women (with a mean age of 65.6 ± 10.0 years) were included in the study. The MPR image obtained via 3D-DSA had a significantly better visibility of the feeding artery and fistulous point than that acquired via 4D-DSA (

conclusionThe MPR images obtained via 4D-DSA may be slightly inferior to those acquired via 3D-DSA in identifying fine angioarchitecture in DAVF. However, they were comparable in terms of diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Angiography, Digital SubtractionCentral Nervous System Vascular MalformationsImaging, Three-DimensionalAgedCerebral AngiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesanatomical diagnosisDural arteriovenous fistulaendovascular neurosurgeryfour-dimensional digital subtraction angiography

Identifiers

PMID36523199
PMCPMC11569469
OpenAlexW4311605854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.