Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36522834›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2023

Inequalities in the omission of axillary dissection in sentinel lymph node positive patients in the Netherlands: Innovative hospitals are early adopters of a de-escalating approach.

Julia E C van Steenhoven, Marissa C van Maaren, Eline E F Verreck, Robert J Schipper, Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen, Anne Kuijer, Sabine Siesling, Thijs van Dalen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Julia E C van SteenhovenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marissa C van MaarenDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eline E F VerreckDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert J SchipperDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Grard A P NieuwenhuijzenDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Anne KuijerDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6666-1368
Sabine SieslingDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Thijs van DalenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last decade completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) was gradually omitted in sentinel lymph node positive (SLN+) breast cancer patients. However, adoption varies among hospitals. We analyzed factors associated with the omission of cALND in all Dutch SLN+ patients. As one of the focus hospital-related factors we defined "innovative" as the percentage of gene-expression profile (GEP) deployment within the indicated group of patients per hospital as a proxy for early adoption of innovations. cT1-2N0M0 SLN+ patients treated between 2011 and 2018 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Hospitals were defined to be innovative based on their GEP use. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) was performed to assess the relationship between innovative capacity, patient-, treatment- and hospital-related characteristics and cALND performance. 14 317 patients were included. Treatment in a hospital with high innovative capacity was associated with a lower probability of receiving cALND (OR 0.69, OR 0.46 and OR 0.35 in modestly, fairly and very innovative, respectively). Other factors associated with a lower probability of receiving a cALND were age 70 and 79 years and ≥79 years (ORs 0.59 [95% CI: 0.50-0.68] and 0.21 [95% CI: 0.17-0.26]) and treatment in an academic hospital (OR 0.41 [95% CI: 0.33-0.51]). Factors associated with an increased probability of undergoing cALND were HR-/HER2- tumors (OR 1.46 [95% CI: 1.19-1.80]), macrometastatic lymph node involvement (OR 6.37 [95% CI: 5.70-7.13]) and mastectomy (OR 4.57 [95% CI: 4.09-5.10]). Patients treated in a hospital that early adopted innovations were less likely to receive cALND. Our findings endorse the need for studies on barriers and facilitators of implementing innovations.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsSentinel Lymph NodeAgedAxillaFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMastectomyNetherlandsSentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Identifiers

PMID36522834
PMCPMC10108210
OpenAlexW4311670582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.