Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36522777›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2022

Characteristics and context of fentanyl test strip use among syringe service clients in southern Wisconsin.

Alyssa Shell Tilhou, Jen Birstler, Amelia Baltes, Elizabeth Salisbury-Afshar, Julia Malicki, Guanhua Chen, Randall Brown

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alyssa Shell TilhouDepartment of Family Medicine, Boston University/Boston Medical Center, 771 Albany St., Dowling 5 South, Rm 5507A, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. alyssa.tilhou@bmc.org.
Jen BirstlerDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Amelia BaltesDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Elizabeth Salisbury-AfsharDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Julia MalickiDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Guanhua ChenDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Randall BrownDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USBoston Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFentanyl adulteration of illicit drugs is a major driver of opioid-involved overdose in the USA. Fentanyl test strips are increasingly used by people who use drugs to check for fentanyl. However, little is known about factors that influence test strip use in this population.

methodsIn this mixed-methods study employing semi-structured open-ended interviews (n = 29) and a structured survey (n = 341), we examined characteristics associated with test strip use, characteristics of test strip use, and situational, logistical and psychosocial factors influencing test strip use. Respondents were recruited from a syringe service program in southern Wisconsin. Bivariate tests of association and multivariable logistic regression examined the relationship between respondent characteristics and test strip use. Summary statistics were used to describe how situational, logistical and psychosocial factors impact test strip use.

resultsMost respondents were male (59.6%), non-Hispanic white (77.4%), young (mean 35.7 years), reported heroin as their primary drug (70.7%), injection as their primary route (87.9%), and use ≥ 3 times daily (78.6%). In multivariable models, site, race and ethnicity, drug of choice, and seeking fentanyl were associated with test strip use. Among test strip users, 36.5% use them most of the time or more and 80.6% get positive results half the time or more. Among individuals reporting heroin, fentanyl, methamphetamine, or cocaine or crack cocaine at least once per month, 99.1%, 56.8%, 42.2%, and 55.7% reported testing these drugs, respectively. Test strip use is supported by information from suppliers, regular transportation, diverse distribution locations, recommendations from harm reduction staff, and having a safe or private place to use.

conclusionsWe found that individuals who use fentanyl test strips are more often non-Hispanic white, use heroin, and seek drugs with fentanyl relative to individuals without test strip use. Findings confirm high fentanyl penetration in the Wisconsin drug supply. Low rates of stimulant testing suggest inadequate awareness of fentanyl penetration. Findings support outreach to key populations, increased diversity of distributing locations, efforts to correct misperceptions about drug wasting, emphasis on pre-consumption testing, and the importance of adjunct behaviors to prevent overdose given high rates of intentional fentanyl use.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseFentanylAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHeroinHumansMaleSyringesWisconsinAnalgesics, OpioidFentanylHeroinDrug testingFentanyl test strip (FTS)Harm reductionOpioidOverdose

Identifiers

PMID36522777
PMCPMC9753354
OpenAlexW4311932698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.