Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36522767›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Intravenous acetaminophen with morphine versus intravenous morphine alone for acute pain in the emergency room: protocol for a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study (ADAMOPA).

Guillaume Cattin, Joel Jenvrin, Jean Benoit Hardouin, Céline Longo, Emmanuel Montassier

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04148495 (Intravenous Acetaminophen and Morphine Versus Intravenous Morphine Alone for Acute Pain in the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04148495 phase4completednot on this map

Intravenous Acetaminophen and Morphine Versus Intravenous Morphine Alone for Acute Pain in the Emergency Department: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Double-blind Non-inferiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNantes University HospitalRan2019 to 2024Enrolled415ConditionsPain ManagementArmsplacebo of acetaminophen IV, acetaminophen IV
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Guillaume CattinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, CHU Nantes, F-44000, Nantes, France.
Joel JenvrinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, CHU Nantes, F-44000, Nantes, France.
Jean Benoit HardouinNantes Université, Université de Tours, INSERM, MethodS in Patients-Centered Outcomes and HEalth Research, SPHERE, F-44000, Nantes, France.
Céline LongoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, CHU Nantes, F-44000, Nantes, France.
Emmanuel MontassierDepartment of Emergency Medicine, CHU Nantes, F-44000, Nantes, France. emmanuel.montassier@chu-nantes.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2313-1172
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche Scientifique et des Technologies de l'Information et de la Communication PHRCI 2018 API18/N/066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn emergency medicine, pain is a frequent reason for consultation. However, there is a great variation in its management which is often insufficient. The use intravenous morphine alone or multimodal analgesia with paracetamol is recommended for severe pain. But robust data are lacking to justify the association of paracetamol with morphine versus morphine alone for pain management in the emergency room (ER). The aim of our study is therefore to assess if in patients with acute pain of moderate to severe intensity with a numerical verbal scale (NVS) ≥5 in the ER, the intravenous administration of morphine alone is not inferior to the administration of intravenous morphine combined with paracetamol at 30 min from the first administration of the study drug.

methodsADAMOPA is a prospective, non-inferiority, multicenter, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, randomized (1:1), double-blind trial. Subjects will be enrolled in the ER if they experience moderate to severe, acute, non-traumatic, and traumatic pain, defined as an NVS ≥5. The primary endpoint will be the between-group difference in mean change in NVS pain scores among patients receiving the combination of intravenous morphine plus paracetamol or intravenous morphine given alone, measured from the time before administration of the study medication to 30 min later. DISCUSSION: This trial will determine the clinical utility of the association of paracetamol with morphine for pain management in the emergency room. The ADAMOPA trial will be conducted in accordance with the International Council on Harmonization Good Clinical Practices.

trial registrationEudraCT number: 2019-002149-39. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT04148495. Date of trial registration: November 1, 2019.

Indexed as

Acute PainMorphineAcetaminophenAdministration, IntravenousAnalgesics, OpioidDouble-Blind MethodEmergency Service, HospitalHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAcetaminophenAnalgesics, OpioidMorphineAnalgesiaEmergency roomMorphinePainParacetamol

Identifiers

PMID36522767
PMCPMC9756523
OpenAlexW4311731170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.