Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36522763›Full record

ArticleImmunity & ageing : I & A2022

Biomarkers of cell damage, neutrophil and macrophage activation associated with in-hospital mortality in geriatric COVID-19 patients.

M Cardelli, E Pierpaoli, F Marchegiani, F Marcheselli, F Piacenza, R Giacconi, R Recchioni, T Casoli, P Stripoli, M Provinciali and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunity & ageing : I & A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Increased levels of GM-CSF and CXCL10 and low CD8Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

M CardelliAdvanced Technology Center for Aging Research, Scientific Technological Area, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy. m.cardelli@inrca.it.
E PierpaoliAdvanced Technology Center for Aging Research, Scientific Technological Area, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
F MarchegianiCenter of Clinical Pathology and Innovative Therapy, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
F MarcheselliCenter of Clinical Pathology and Innovative Therapy, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
F PiacenzaAdvanced Technology Center for Aging Research, Scientific Technological Area, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
R GiacconiAdvanced Technology Center for Aging Research, Scientific Technological Area, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
R RecchioniCenter of Clinical Pathology and Innovative Therapy, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
T CasoliCenter for Neurobiology of Aging, Scientific Technological Area, IRCCS INRCA, Via Birarelli 8, 60121, Ancona, Italy.
P StripoliCenter of Clinical Pathology and Innovative Therapy, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
M ProvincialiAdvanced Technology Center for Aging Research, Scientific Technological Area, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
G MatacchioneDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/a, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
A GiulianiDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/a, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
D RaminiCenter of Clinical Pathology and Innovative Therapy, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
J SabbatinelliSOD Medicina di Laboratorio, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.
M BonafèDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
M Di RosaUnit of Geriatric Pharmacoepidemiology and Biostatistics, IRCCS INRCA, Cosenza, Italy.
A CherubiniGeriatria, Accettazione geriatrica e Centro di Ricerca per l'invecchiamento, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
C Di PentimaInternal Medicine and Geriatrics, IRCCS INRCA, Via della Montagnola 81, 60127, Ancona, Italy.
F SpannellaInternal Medicine and Geriatrics, IRCCS INRCA, Via della Montagnola 81, 60127, Ancona, Italy.
R AntonicelliCardiology Unit, IRCCS INRCA, 60129, Ancona, Italy.
A R BonfigliScientific Direction and Geriatric Unit, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
F OlivieriDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Tronto 10/a, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
F LattanzioScientific Direction and Geriatric Unit, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale di Riposo e Cura per Anziani · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti · ITInnova (Italy) · ITUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe risk for symptomatic COVID-19 requiring hospitalization is higher in the older population. The course of the disease in hospitalised older patients may show significant variation, from mild to severe illness, ultimately leading to death in the most critical cases. The analysis of circulating biomolecules involved in mechanisms of inflammation, cell damage and innate immunity could lead to identify new biomarkers of COVID-19 severity, aimed to improve the clinical management of subjects at higher risk of severe outcomes. In a cohort of COVID-19 geriatric patients (n= 156) who required hospitalization we analysed, on-admission, a series of circulating biomarkers related to neutrophil activation (neutrophil elastase, LL-37), macrophage activation (sCD163) and cell damage (nuclear cfDNA, mithocondrial cfDNA and nuclear cfDNA integrity). The above reported biomarkers were tested for their association with in-hospital mortality and with clinical, inflammatory and routine hematological parameters. Aim of the study was to unravel prognostic parameters for risk stratification of COVID-19 patients.

resultsLower n-cfDNA integrity, higher neutrophil elastase and higher sCD163 levels were significantly associated with an increased risk of in-hospital decease. Median (IQR) values observed in discharged vs. deceased patients were: 0.50 (0.30-0.72) vs. 0.33 (0.22-0.62) for n-cfDNA integrity; 94.0 (47.7-154.0) ng/ml vs. 115.7 (84.2-212.7) ng/ml for neutrophil elastase; 614.0 (370.0-821.0) ng/ml vs. 787.0 (560.0-1304.0) ng/ml for sCD163. The analysis of survival curves in patients stratified for tertiles of each biomarker showed that patients with n-cfDNA integrity < 0.32 or sCD163 in the range 492-811 ng/ml had higher risk of in-hospital decease than, respectively, patients with higher n-cfDNA integrity or lower sCD163. These associations were further confirmed in multivariate models adjusted for age, sex and outcome-related clinical variables. In these models also high levels of neutrophil elastase (>150 ng/ml) appeared to be independent predictor of in-hospital death. An additional analysis of neutrophil elastase in patients stratified for n-cfDNA integrity levels was conducted to better describe the association of the studied parameters with the outcome.

conclusionsOn the whole, biomarkers of cell-free DNA integrity, neutrophil and macrophage activation might provide a valuable contribution to identify geriatric patients with high risk of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality.

Indexed as

AlucfDNACOVID-19Geriatric patientsin-hospital mortalityNeutrophil elastasePrognostic biomarkerSARS-CoV-2sCD163

Identifiers

PMID36522763
PMCPMC9751505
OpenAlexW4311511307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.