ArticleBMC plant biology2022
A reappraisal of the phylogeny and historical biogeography of Sparganium (Typhaceae) using complete chloroplast genomes.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Chloroplast Genomes of Four Wild Species of the GenusGenes · 2025Article
- The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024Article
- Comparative study on chloroplast genomes of three Hansenia forbesii varieties (Apiaceae).PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSparganium (Typhaceae) is a widespread temperate genus of ecologically important aquatic plants. Previous reconstructions of the phylogenetic relationships among Sparganium species are incompletely resolved partly because they were based on molecular markers comprising < 7,000 bp. Here, we sequenced and assembled the complete chloroplast genomes from 19 Sparganium samples representing 15 putative species and three putative subspecies in order to explore chloroplast genome evolution in this genus, clarify taxonomic lineages, estimate the divergence times of Sparganium species, and reconstruct aspects of the biogeographic history of the genus.
resultsThe 19 chloroplast genomes shared a conserved genome structure, gene content, and gene order. Our phylogenomic analysis presented a well-resolved phylogeny with robust support for most clades. Non-monophyly was revealed in three species: S. erectum, S. eurycarpum, and S. stoloniferum. Divergence time estimates suggest that the two subgenera of Sparganium split from each other ca. 30.67 Ma in the middle Oligocene. The subgenus Xanthosparganium diversified in the late Oligocene and Miocene, while the subgenus Sparganium diversified in the late Pliocene and Pleistocene. Ancestral area reconstruction suggested that the two subgenera may have originated in East Eurasia and North America.
conclusionThe non-monophyletic nature of three putative species underscores the necessity of taxonomic revision for Sparganium: S. stoloniferum subsp. choui may be more appropriately identified as S. choui, and subspecies of S. erectum may be in fact distinct species. The estimated diversification times of the two subgenera correspond to their species and nucleotide diversities. The likely ancestral area for most of subgenus Xanthosparganium was East Eurasia and North America from where it dispersed into West Eurasia and Australia. Most of subgenus Sparganium likely originated in North America and then dispersed into Eurasia. Our study demonstrates some of the ways in which complete chloroplast genome sequences can provide new insights into the evolution, phylogeny, and biogeography of the genus Sparganium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.