Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36522522›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A fast kernel independence test for cluster-correlated data.

Hoseung Song, Hongjiao Liu, Michael C Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hoseung SongPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Hongjiao LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
Michael C WuPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. mcwu@fredhutch.org.

Funding

MsFLASH: Living a Healthy MenopauseR01AG048209 · NIA · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GUTHRIE, KATHERINE ADAMS, LACROIX, ANDREA Z. · 2015 to 2019
$7.2M
Statistical Methods for Large Scale Microbiome Studies of Cardiovascular Disease RiskR01HL155417 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI WU, MICHAEL CHIAO-AN · 2021 to 2024
$1.8M
Joint Analysis of Microbiome and Other Genomic Data TypesR01GM129512 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI WU, MICHAEL CHIAO-AN · 2018 to 2021
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL155417NIA NIH HHS R01 AG048209NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM129512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cluster-correlated data receives a lot of attention in biomedical and longitudinal studies and it is of interest to assess the generalized dependence between two multivariate variables under the cluster-correlated structure. The Hilbert-Schmidt independence criterion (HSIC) is a powerful kernel-based test statistic that captures various dependence between two random vectors and can be applied to an arbitrary non-Euclidean domain. However, the existing HSIC is not directly applicable to cluster-correlated data. Therefore, we propose a HSIC-based test of independence for cluster-correlated data. The new test statistic combines kernel information so that the dependence structure in each cluster is fully considered and exhibits good performance under high dimensions. Moreover, a rapid p value approximation makes the new test fast applicable to large datasets. Numerical studies show that the new approach performs well in both synthetic and real world data.

Indexed as

Algorithms

Identifiers

PMID36522522
PMCPMC9755291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.