ArticlePediatric surgery international2022
Multidisciplinary management of pediatric malignant rhabdoid tumor based on 5 years of experience at a tertiary care center.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveMalignant rhabdoid tumor (MRT) is a highly aggressive tumor that occurs mostly in young children with extremely poor prognosis. Standardized and effective treatment strategies for MRT have yet to be established because of its rarity. Here, we report our single-institutional experience involving MRT treatment.
methodsPatients with newly diagnosed MRT between March 2016 and October 2021 were included. The clinical characteristic, treatment-related toxicities, clinical outcomes, and prognostic factor were retrospectively analyzed.
resultsA total of 18 patients with MRT were enrolled during the 5 years. The median age was 42.8 months (range 10 to 82 years). Among the 18 patients, 9 patients died after a median of follow-up 26 months (range 3 to 42 months). The 1-year event-free survival (EFS) and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates of the entire cohort were 63% (95% CI 46% to 74%) and 67% (95% CI 49% to 82%), respectively. Univariate analysis of patients who underwent gross or total resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy demonstrated an improvement in 1-year EFS. However, only gross resection and total resection predicted a better 3-year OS.
conclusionsSurgical excision is still the mainstream treatment for MRT. Postoperative adjuvant treatments including chemotherapy and radiotherapy contribute to improved disease control rate. Our single-institute experience may provide insights into the multimodal treatment of MRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.