ArticleBritish journal of cancer2023
Attention-based deep learning for breast lesions classification on contrast enhanced spectral mammography: a multicentre study.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Diagnostic Value of Deep Learning for Multi-Classification of Rectal Cancer T Staging Based on Regional Attention.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Histopathological diagnosis of Ovine Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma (OPA) based on ensemble model.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Calibrated Transformer Fusion for Dual-View Low-Energy CESM Classification.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Achieving single-contrast administration for enhanced chest CT and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography without compromising diagnostic quality: a comparative study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025Article
- Mining tumor and surrounding tissue information using artificial intelligence to predict responses to EGFR-targeted therapies and immunotherapy in lung cancer: a multicenter attribution analysis.La Radiologia medica · 2025Article
- Relation knowledge distillation 3D-ResNet-based deep learning for breast cancer molecular subtypes prediction on ultrasound videos: a multicenter study.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- From Innovation to Application: Can Emerging Imaging Techniques Transform Breast Cancer Diagnosis?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Contrast Enhancement in Breast Cancer: Magnetic Resonance vs. Mammography: A 10-Year Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- State-of-the-art for contrast-enhanced mammography.The British journal of radiology · 2024Review
- Preliminary Evidence of the Use of Generative AI in Health Care Clinical Services: Systematic Narrative Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Review
- Improved detection of aortic dissection in non-contrast-enhanced chest CT using an attention-based deep learning model.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Detection and classification of breast lesions using multiple information on contrast-enhanced mammography by a multiprocess deep-learning system: A multicenter study.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Breast Imaging: Current Status and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to develop an attention-based deep learning model for distinguishing benign from malignant breast lesions on CESM.
methodsPreoperative CESM images of 1239 patients, which were definitely diagnosed on pathology in a multicentre cohort, were divided into training and validation sets, internal and external test sets. The regions of interest of the breast lesions were outlined manually by a senior radiologist. We adopted three conventional convolutional neural networks (CNNs), namely, DenseNet 121, Xception, and ResNet 50, as the backbone architectures and incorporated the convolutional block attention module (CBAM) into them for classification. The performance of the models was analysed in terms of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, accuracy, the positive predictive value (PPV), the negative predictive value (NPV), the F1 score, the precision recall curve (PRC), and heat maps. The final models were compared with the diagnostic performance of conventional CNNs, radiomics models, and two radiologists with specialised breast imaging experience.
resultsThe best-performing deep learning model, that is, the CBAM-based Xception, achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.970, a sensitivity of 0.848, a specificity of 1.000, and an accuracy of 0.891 on the external test set, which was higher than those of other CNNs, radiomics models, and radiologists. The PRC and the heat maps also indicated the favourable predictive performance of the attention-based CNN model. The diagnostic performance of two radiologists improved with deep learning assistance.
conclusionsUsing an attention-based deep learning model based on CESM images can help to distinguishing benign from malignant breast lesions, and the diagnostic performance of radiologists improved with deep learning assistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.