Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36522404›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2023

Disentangling the roles of dopamine and noradrenaline in the exploration-exploitation tradeoff during human decision-making.

Anna Cremer, Felix Kalbe, Jana Christina Müller, Klaus Wiedemann, Lars Schwabe

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Computational Mechanisms of Information-Seeking in Anxiety.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Dopamine and Norepinephrine Differentially Mediate the Exploration-Exploitation Tradeoff.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Adaptive Responding to Stimulus-Outcome Associations Requires Noradrenergic Transmission in the Medial Prefrontal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna CremerDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Felix KalbeDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Jana Christina MüllerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Klaus WiedemannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Lars SchwabeDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. lars.schwabe@uni-hamburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4429-4373
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Balancing the exploration of new options and the exploitation of known options is a fundamental challenge in decision-making, yet the mechanisms involved in this balance are not fully understood. Here, we aimed to elucidate the distinct roles of dopamine and noradrenaline in the exploration-exploitation tradeoff during human choice. To this end, we used a double-blind, placebo-controlled design in which participants received either a placebo, 400 mg of the D2/D3 receptor antagonist amisulpride, or 40 mg of the β-adrenergic receptor antagonist propranolol before they completed a virtual patch-foraging task probing exploration and exploitation. We systematically varied the rewards associated with choice options, the rate by which rewards decreased over time, and the opportunity costs it took to switch to the next option to disentangle the contributions of dopamine and noradrenaline to specific choice aspects. Our data show that amisulpride increased the sensitivity to all of these three critical choice features, whereas propranolol was associated with a reduced tendency to use value information. Our findings provide novel insights into the specific roles of dopamine and noradrenaline in the regulation of human choice behavior, suggesting a critical involvement of dopamine in directed exploration and a role of noradrenaline in more random exploration.

Indexed as

DopamineNorepinephrineAmisulprideDecision MakingDopamine AntagonistsHumansPropranololRewardAmisulprideDopamineDopamine AntagonistsNorepinephrinePropranolol

Identifiers

PMID36522404
PMCPMC10209107
OpenAlexW4311663566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.