Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36522383›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

The psychological and political correlates of conspiracy theory beliefs.

Joseph Uscinski, Adam Enders, Amanda Diekman, John Funchion, Casey Klofstad, Sandra Kuebler, Manohar Murthi, Kamal Premaratne, Michelle Seelig, Daniel Verdear and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Joseph UscinskiDepartment of Political Science, University of Miami, 1300 Campo Sano Blvd., Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA. uscinski@miami.edu.
Adam EndersDepartment of Political Science, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA.
Amanda DiekmanDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
John FunchionDepartment of English, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA.
Casey KlofstadDepartment of Political Science, University of Miami, 1300 Campo Sano Blvd., Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA.
Sandra KueblerDepartment of Linguistics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Manohar MurthiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA.
Kamal PremaratneDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA.
Michelle SeeligDepartment of Cinema and Interactive Media, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA.
Daniel VerdearDepartment of Computer Science, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA.
Stefan WuchtyDepartment of Computer Science, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, 33146, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the individual-level characteristics associated with conspiracy theory beliefs is vital to addressing and combatting those beliefs. While researchers have identified numerous psychological and political characteristics associated with conspiracy theory beliefs, the generalizability of those findings is uncertain because they are typically drawn from studies of only a few conspiracy theories. Here, we employ a national survey of 2021 U.S. adults that asks about 15 psychological and political characteristics as well as beliefs in 39 different conspiracy theories. Across 585 relationships examined within both bivariate (correlations) and multivariate (regression) frameworks, we find that psychological traits (e.g., dark triad) and non-partisan/ideological political worldviews (e.g., populism, support for violence) are most strongly related to individual conspiracy theory beliefs, regardless of the belief under consideration, while other previously identified correlates (e.g., partisanship, ideological extremity) are inconsistently related. We also find that the correlates of specific conspiracy theory beliefs mirror those of conspiracy thinking (the predisposition), indicating that this predisposition operates like an 'average' of individual conspiracy theory beliefs. Overall, our findings detail the psychological and political traits of the individuals most drawn to conspiracy theories and have important implications for scholars and practitioners seeking to prevent or reduce the impact of conspiracy theories.

Indexed as

ViolenceAdultDisease SusceptibilityHumansUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID36522383
PMCPMC9751515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.