ArticleNature communications2022
Achieving single nucleotide sensitivity in direct hybridization genome imaging.
Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging the time course of DNA damage response at a nonrepetitive endogenous locus.Cell reports methods · 2025Article
- Unveiling the invisible genomic dynamics.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Detachable DNA Assembly Module to Dissect Tumor Cells Heterogeneity via RNA Pinpoint Screening.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Helicase Activity Modulation with On-Demand Light-Based Conformational Control.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Direct visualization of point mutations in situ can be informative for studying genetic diseases and nuclear biology. We describe a direct hybridization genome imaging method with single-nucleotide sensitivity, single guide genome oligopaint via local denaturation fluorescence in situ hybridization (sgGOLDFISH), which leverages the high cleavage specificity of eSpCas9(1.1) variant combined with a rationally designed guide RNA to load a superhelicase and reveal probe binding sites through local denaturation. The guide RNA carries an intentionally introduced mismatch so that while wild-type target DNA sequence can be efficiently cleaved, a mutant sequence with an additional mismatch (e.g., caused by a point mutation) cannot be cleaved. Because sgGOLDFISH relies on genomic DNA being cleaved by Cas9 to reveal probe binding sites, the probes will only label the wild-type sequence but not the mutant sequence. Therefore, sgGOLDFISH has the sensitivity to differentiate the wild-type and mutant sequences differing by only a single base pair. Using sgGOLDFISH, we identify base-editor-modified and unmodified progeroid fibroblasts from a heterogeneous population, validate the identification through progerin immunofluorescence, and demonstrate accurate sub-nuclear localization of point mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.