Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36522209›Full record

ReviewLancet (London, England)2022

Challenges and opportunities for educating health professionals after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Julio Frenk, Lincoln C Chen, Latha Chandran, Elizabeth O H Groff, Roderick King, Afaf Meleis, Harvey V Fineberg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Lancet (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
158citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

158 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julio FrenkOffice of the President, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Lincoln C ChenChina Medical Board, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Latha ChandranDepartment of Medical Education and Department of Pediatrics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA. Electronic address: lchandran@med.miami.edu.
Elizabeth O H GroffDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA.
Roderick KingDepartment of Pediatrics and Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Afaf MeleisSchool of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Harvey V FinebergGordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Palo Alto, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The education of health professionals substantially changed before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. A 2010 Lancet Commission examined the 100-year history of health-professional education, beginning with the 1910 Flexner report. Since the publication of the Lancet Commission, several transformative developments have happened, including in competency-based education, interprofessional education, and the large-scale application of information technology to education. Although the COVID-19 pandemic did not initiate these developments, it increased their implementation, and they are likely to have a long-term effect on health-professional education. They converge with other societal changes, such as globalisation of health care and increasing concerns of health disparities across the world, that were exacerbated by the pandemic. In this Health Policy, we list institutional and instructional reforms to assess what has happened to health-professional education since the publication of the Lancet Commission and how the COVID-19 pandemic altered the education process.

Indexed as

COVID-19Delivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansPandemics

Identifiers

PMID36522209
PMCPMC9612849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.