Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36521898›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

New Therapeutics in Alzheimer's Disease Longitudinal Cohort study (NTAD): study protocol.

Juliette Helene Lanskey, Ece Kocagoncu, Andrew J Quinn, Yun-Ju Cheng, Melek Karadag, Jemma Pitt, Stephen Lowe, Michael Perkinton, Vanessa Raymont, Krish D Singh and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Alzheimer's disease and its progression reduce pyramidal cell gain and connectivity.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Juliette Helene LanskeyMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK juliette.lanskey@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6626-7686
Ece KocagoncuDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6292-7472
Andrew J QuinnOxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2267-9897
Yun-Ju ChengLilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Melek KaradagDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jemma PittOxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6256-6091
Stephen LoweLilly Centre for Clinical Pharmacology, Singapore.
Michael PerkintonNeuroscience, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Vanessa RaymontDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8238-4279
Krish D SinghCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3094-2475
Mark WoolrichOxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8460-8854
Anna C NobreOxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5762-2802
Richard N HensonMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0712-2639
James B RoweMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7216-8679
NTAD study group
University of Oxford · GBMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBCardiff University · GBEli Lilly (United States) · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/12Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/8Medical Research Council MC_UU_00030/8Medical Research Council MR/L023784/1Medical Research Council MR/L023784/2Medical Research Council MR/T033371/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 103838Wellcome Trust 104571/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 203139/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWith the pressing need to develop treatments that slow or stop the progression of Alzheimer's disease, new tools are needed to reduce clinical trial duration and validate new targets for human therapeutics. Such tools could be derived from neurophysiological measurements of disease. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The New Therapeutics in Alzheimer's Disease study (NTAD) aims to identify a biomarker set from magneto/electroencephalography that is sensitive to disease and progression over 1 year. The study will recruit 100 people with amyloid-positive mild cognitive impairment or early-stage Alzheimer's disease and 30 healthy controls aged between 50 and 85 years. Measurements of the clinical, cognitive and imaging data (magnetoencephalography, electroencephalography and MRI) of all participants will be taken at baseline. These measurements will be repeated after approximately 1 year on participants with Alzheimer's disease or mild cognitive impairment, and clinical and cognitive assessment of these participants will be repeated again after approximately 2 years. To assess reliability of magneto/electroencephalographic changes, a subset of 30 participants with mild cognitive impairment or early-stage Alzheimer's disease will also undergo repeat magneto/electroencephalography 2 weeks after baseline. Baseline and longitudinal changes in neurophysiology are the primary analyses of interest. Additional outputs will include atrophy and cognitive change and estimated numbers needed to treat each arm of simulated clinical trials of a future disease-modifying therapy. ETHICS AND DATA STATEMENT: The study has received a favourable opinion from the East of England Cambridge Central Research Ethics Committee (REC reference 18/EE/0042). Results will be disseminated through internal reports, peer-reviewed scientific journals, conference presentations, website publication, submission to regulatory authorities and other publications. Data will be made available via the Dementias Platform UK Data Portal on completion of initial analyses by the NTAD study group.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDisease ProgressionHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsDementiaNEUROLOGYNeurophysiologyNEUROPHYSIOLOGYProtocols & guidelinesRADIOLOGY & IMAGING

Identifiers

PMID36521898
PMCPMC9756184
OpenAlexW4311732008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.