Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36521881›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Diagnostic pathways for breast cancer in 10 International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) jurisdictions: an international comparative cohort study based on questionnaire and registry data.

Peter Vedsted, David Weller, Alina Zalounina Falborg, Henry Jensen, Jatinderpal Kalsi, David Brewster, Yulan Lin, Anna Gavin, Andriana Barisic, Eva Grunfeld and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 15 institutions in 6 countries.

Peter Vedsted *Department for Clinical Medicine, Aarhus Universitet, Aarhus, Denmark p.vedsted@clin.au.dk.
David Weller *General Practice, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Alina Zalounina FalborgDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Henry JensenDepartment of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4040-7334
Jatinderpal KalsiGynaecological Cancer Research Centre, University College London, London, UK.
David BrewsterScottish Registry, Information Services Division, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Yulan LinDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Anna GavinN Ireland Cancer Registry, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Andriana BarisicRenal Network, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eva GrunfeldDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mats LambeUniversity Hospital, Regional Cancer Centre of Central Sweden, Uppsala, Sweden.
Martin MalmbergDepartment of Oncology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Donna TurnerPopulation Oncology, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Elizabeth HarlandDepartment of Epidemiology and Cancer Registry, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Breann HawrylukPatient Navigation, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Rebecca-Jane LawNorth Wales Centre for Primary Care Research, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1435-5086
Richard D NealUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3544-2744
Victoria WhiteCBRC, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rebecca BerginCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Samantha HarrisonPolicy and Information, Cancer Research UK, London, UK.
Usha MenonWomen's Cancer, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3708-1732
ICBP Module 4 Working Group
ICBP Module 4 Academic Reference Group
Aarhus University · DKCancerCare Manitoba · CAUniversity College London · GBBangor University · GBCancer Care Ontario · CACancer Council Victoria · AUCancer Research UK · GBDeakin University · AUFujian Medical University · CNLund University · SENational Health Service Scotland · GBOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CAQueen's University Belfast · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UKMedical Research Council MC_UU_00004/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesA growing body of evidence suggests longer time between symptom onset and start of treatment affects breast cancer prognosis. To explore this association, the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership Module 4 examined differences in breast cancer diagnostic pathways in 10 jurisdictions across Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK.

settingPrimary care in 10 jurisdictions. PARTICIPANT: Data were collated from 3471 women aged >40 diagnosed for the first time with breast cancer and surveyed between 2013 and 2015. Data were supplemented by feedback from their primary care physicians (PCPs), cancer treatment specialists and available registry data. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient, primary care, diagnostic and treatment intervals.

resultsOverall, 56% of women reported symptoms to primary care, with 66% first noticing lumps or breast changes. PCPs reported 77% presented with symptoms, of whom 81% were urgently referred with suspicion of cancer (ranging from 62% to 92%; Norway and Victoria). Ranges for median patient, primary care and diagnostic intervals (days) for symptomatic patients were 3-29 (Denmark and Sweden), 0-20 (seven jurisdictions and Ontario) and 8-29 (Denmark and Wales). Ranges for median treatment and total intervals (days) for all patients were 15-39 (Norway, Victoria and Manitoba) and 4-78 days (Sweden, Victoria and Ontario). The 10% longest waits ranged between 101 and 209 days (Sweden and Ontario).

conclusionsLarge international differences in breast cancer diagnostic pathways exist, suggesting some jurisdictions develop more effective strategies to optimise pathways and reduce time intervals. Targeted awareness interventions could also facilitate more timely diagnosis of breast cancer.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansOntarioRoutinely Collected Health DataSurveys and QuestionnairesVictoriaAdult oncologyBreast tumoursEpidemiologyInternational health servicesPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID36521881
PMCPMC9756230
OpenAlexW4311548889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.