Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36521358›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2023

UncertainSCI: Uncertainty quantification for computational models in biomedicine and bioengineering.

Akil Narayan, Zexin Liu, Jake A Bergquist, Chantel Charlebois, Sumientra Rampersad, Lindsay Rupp, Dana Brooks, Dan White, Jess Tate, Rob S MacLeod

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Uncertainty Quantification forChemical reviews · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. A computational study on the influence of antegrade accessory pathway location on the 12-lead electrocardiogram in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Akil NarayanScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, 72 Central Campus Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, United States; Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, 72 Central Campus Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, United States. Electronic address: akil@sci.utah.edu.
Zexin LiuScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, 72 Central Campus Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, United States; Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, 72 Central Campus Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, United States.
Jake A BergquistScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, 72 Central Campus Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, 72 Central Campus Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, United States.
Chantel CharleboisScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, 72 Central Campus Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, 72 Central Campus Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, United States.
Sumientra RampersadDepartment of Physics, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Lindsay RuppScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, 72 Central Campus Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, 72 Central Campus Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, United States.
Dana BrooksDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Dan WhiteScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, 72 Central Campus Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, 72 Central Campus Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, United States.
Jess TateScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, 72 Central Campus Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, 72 Central Campus Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, United States.
Rob S MacLeodScientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, 72 Central Campus Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, 72 Central Campus Dr, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, United States.

Funding

TRD - VisualizationP41GM103545 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER R., MACLEOD, ROB S. · 2012 to 2019
$9.7M
Center for Integrative Biomedical Computing Legacy TransitionR24GM136986 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER R., MACLEOD, ROB S. · 2020 to 2022
$1.6M
Integration of Uncertainty Quantification with SCIRun Bioelectric Field Simulation PipelineU24EB029012 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MACLEOD, ROB S. · 2019 to 2021
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS U24 EB029012NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103545NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM136986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputational biomedical simulations frequently contain parameters that model physical features, material coefficients, and physiological effects, whose values are typically assumed known a priori. Understanding the effect of variability in those assumed values is currently a topic of great interest. A general-purpose software tool that quantifies how variation in these parameters affects model outputs is not broadly available in biomedicine. For this reason, we developed the 'UncertainSCI' uncertainty quantification software suite to facilitate analysis of uncertainty due to parametric variability.

methodsWe developed and distributed a new open-source Python-based software tool, UncertainSCI, which employs advanced parameter sampling techniques to build polynomial chaos (PC) emulators that can be used to predict model outputs for general parameter values. Uncertainty of model outputs is studied by modeling parameters as random variables, and model output statistics and sensitivities are then easily computed from the emulator. Our approaches utilize modern, near-optimal techniques for sampling and PC construction based on weighted Fekete points constructed by subsampling from a suitably randomized candidate set.

resultsConcentrating on two test cases-modeling bioelectric potentials in the heart and electric stimulation in the brain-we illustrate the use of UncertainSCI to estimate variability, statistics, and sensitivities associated with multiple parameters in these models.

conclusionUncertainSCI is a powerful yet lightweight tool enabling sophisticated probing of parametric variability and uncertainty in biomedical simulations. Its non-intrusive pipeline allows users to leverage existing software libraries and suites to accurately ascertain parametric uncertainty in a variety of applications.

Indexed as

HeartSoftwareBioengineeringComputer SimulationUncertaintyBiomedical simulationsOpen-source softwareUncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID36521358
PMCPMC9812870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.