Trial reportBlood advances2023
Polatuzumab vedotin with infusional chemotherapy for untreated aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04231877 (A Pilot Study to Estimate the Safety and Tolerability of the Combination of Polatuzumab Vedotin, With or Without Glofitamab, With Dose Adjusted Rituximab, Etoposide, Cyclophosphamide, and Doxorubicin), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Pilot Study to Estimate the Safety and Tolerability of the Combination of Polatuzumab Vedotin, With or Without Glofitamab, With Dose Adjusted Rituximab, Etoposide, Cyclophosphamide, and Doxorubicin (PERCH) for Upfront Treatment of Aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- A multicenter phase 1/2 trial of lenalidomide and dose-adjusted EPOCH-R in MYC-associated DLBCL.Blood advances · 2025Trial
- Analysis of cell-free DNA in lymphomas: from sample collection to genotyping and minimal residual disease monitoring.Blood advances · 2026Review
- First-line Polatuzumab vedotin plus R-CHP in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma: A real-world study bridging the gap of the POLARIX trial.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Strategic Combinations of Antibody-Drug Conjugates from 2023 to 2025: From Dual Therapies to Innovative ADC-Based Regimens.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Overcoming resistance to antibody-drug conjugates: from mechanistic insights to cutting-edge strategies.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025Review
- Efficacy of Pola-R-CHP and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Untreated Burkitt Lymphoma: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- Pola-R-CHP performed well in first-line Polarix trial-ineligible and IPI 0-1 DLBCL patients : Article type: research.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- Pharmacovigilance analysis of polatuzumab plus bendamustine and rituximab treatment protocol: identifying comprehensive safety signals using FDA database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Spotlight on polatuzumab vedotin: new standards for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma?Haematologica · 2024Review
- Circulating Tumor DNA in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: from Bench to Bedside?Current treatment options in oncology · 2024Review
- Advances in Polatuzumab Vedotin-PIIQ Therapy: A Review of Treatment Efficacy in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma and High-Grade B Cell Lymphoma.Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The POLARIX trial demonstrated the superiority of polatuzumab vedotin (Pola) over vincristine in the rituximab-cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisone (R-CHOP) regimen for large B-cell lymphomas, but it is unknown whether Pola can be safely incorporated into intensified regimens (eg, dose-adjusted [DA]-EPOCH-R [etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and rituximab]) typically used for the highest risk histologies. This was a single-center, open-label, prospective clinical trial of 6 cycles of Pola-DA-EPCH-R (vincristine omitted) in aggressive large B-cell lymphomas. The primary end point was to estimate the safety of Pola-DA-EPCH-R as measured by the rate of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first 2 cycles with prespecified suspension rules. Secondary and exploratory end points included efficacy and correlation with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels. We enrolled 18 patients on study, and with only 3 DLTs observed, the study met its primary end point for safety. There were 5 serious adverse events, including grade 3 febrile neutropenia (3, 17%), grade 3 colonic perforation in the setting of diverticulitis, and grade 5 sepsis/typhlitis. Among 17 evaluable patients, the best overall response rate was 100%, and the complete response rate was 76%. With a median follow-up of 12.9 months, 12-month event-free survival was 72%, and 12-month overall survival was 94%. No patient with undetectable ctDNA at the end of treatment has relapsed to date. Using Pola to replace vincristine in the DA-EPOCH-R regimen met its primary safety end point. These data support the further evaluation and use of this approach in histologies where the potential benefit of both an intensified regimen and Pola may be desired. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04231877.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.