Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36520942›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Repositioning of acefylline as anti-cancer drug: Synthesis, anticancer and computational studies of azomethines derived from acefylline tethered 4-amino-3-mercapto-1,2,4-triazole.

Irum Shahzadi, Ameer Fawad Zahoor, Burak Tüzün, Asim Mansha, Muhammad Naveed Anjum, Azhar Rasul, Ali Irfan, Katarzyna Kotwica-Mojzych, Mariusz Mojzych

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Irum ShahzadiDepartment of Chemistry, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Ameer Fawad ZahoorDepartment of Chemistry, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-2127-8848
Burak TüzünPlant and Animal Production Department, Technical Sciences Vocational School of Sivas, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey.
Asim ManshaDepartment of Chemistry, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Naveed AnjumDepartment of Applied Chemistry, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Azhar RasulDepartment of Zoology, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Ali IrfanDepartment of Chemistry, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-8977-3303
Katarzyna Kotwica-MojzychLaboratory of Experimental Cytology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Mariusz MojzychDepartment of Chemistry, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Siedlce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9884-6068
Government College University, Faisalabad · PKMedical University of Lublin · PLSivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi · TRUniversity of Siedlce · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel azomethines derived from acefylline tethered triazole hybrids (7a-k) have been synthesized and evaluated against human liver cancer cell line (Hep G2) using MTT assay. The synthesized series of azomethines exhibited promising efficacy against liver cancer cell line. Screening of the synthesized series identified compound 7d with the least cell viability value (11.71 ± 0.39%) as the most potent anticancer agent in contrast to the reference drug acefylline (cell viability = 80 ± 3.87%). In this study, the potentials of the novel agents (7a-k) to inhibit liver cancer proteins were assessed. Subsequently, the structure-activity relationship of the potential drug candidates was assessed via ADME/T molecular screening. The cytotoxic potential of these derivatives was also investigated by hemolysis and thrombolysis. Their hemolytic and thrombolytic studies showed that all of these drugs had very low cytotoxicity and moderate clot lysis activity. Compound 7g (0.26% hemolysis) and 7k (52.1% clot lysis) were the least toxic and moderate thrombolytic agents respectively.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsLiver NeoplasmsAzo CompoundsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug RepositioningDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorHemolysisHumansMolecular StructureStructure-Activity RelationshipTheophyllineThiosemicarbazonesTriazoles1,2,4-triazoleacefyllineAntineoplastic AgentsAzo CompoundsazomethineTheophyllineThiosemicarbazonesTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID36520942
PMCPMC9754256
OpenAlexW4311601946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.