Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36520537›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2022

A Framework for Public Health Authorities to Evaluate Health Determinants for Wastewater-Based Epidemiology.

Carla J Eaton, Sarah Coxon, Isabelle Pattis, Andrew Chappell, Joanne Hewitt, Brent J Gilpin

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exploring anabasine excretion factor in individuals who use tobacco cigarettes: a preliminary estimate.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Coupling wastewater-based epidemiology with data-driven machine learning for managing public health risks.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
  4. Using Wastewater to Monitor Suggested Changes in Dietary Intake: A Participatory Experiment.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carla J EatonInstitute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd., Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0633-1535
Sarah CoxonInstitute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd., Christchurch, New Zealand.
Isabelle PattisInstitute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd., Christchurch, New Zealand.
Andrew ChappellInstitute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd., Christchurch, New Zealand.
Joanne HewittInstitute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd., Porirua, New Zealand.
Brent J GilpinInstitute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd., Christchurch, New Zealand.
New Zealand Institute for Public Health and Forensic Science · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) is rapidly developing as a powerful public health tool. It can provide information about a wide range of health determinants (HDs), including community exposure to environmental hazards, trends in consumption of licit and illicit substances, spread of infectious diseases, and general community health. As such, the list of possible candidate HDs for WBE is almost limitless. Consequently, a means to evaluate and prioritize suitable candidates for WBE is useful, particularly for public health authorities, who often face resource constraints.

objectivesWe have developed a framework to assist public health authorities to decide what HDs may be appropriate for WBE and what biomarkers could be used. This commentary reflects the experience of the authors, who work at the interface of research and public health implementation. DISCUSSION: To be suitable for WBE, a candidate HD should address a public health or scientific issue that would benefit from better understanding at the population level. For HDs where information on individual exposures or stratification by population subgroups is required, WBE is less suitable. Where other methodologies are already used to monitor the candidate HD, consideration must be given to whether WBE could provide better or complementary information to the current approach. An essential requirement of WBE is a biomarker specific for the candidate HD. A biomarker in this context refers to any human-excreted chemical or biological that could act as an indicator of consumption or exposure to an environmental hazard or of the human health state. Suitable biomarkers should meet several criteria outlined in this commentary, which requires background knowledge for both the biomarker and the HD. An evaluation tree summarizing key considerations for public health authorities when assessing the suitability of candidate HDs for WBE and an example evaluation are presented. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11115.

Indexed as

Public HealthWastewater-Based Epidemiological MonitoringBiomarkersHumansWastewaterBiomarkersWastewater

Identifiers

PMID36520537
PMCPMC9754092
OpenAlexW4311548733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.