Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36520342›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2023

Variability of Single Pulse Electrical Stimulation Responses Recorded with Intracranial Electroencephalography in Epileptic Patients.

Maciej Jedynak, Anthony Boyer, Blandine Chanteloup-Forêt, Manik Bhattacharjee, Carole Saubat, François Tadel, Philippe Kahane, Olivier David, F-TRACT Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Causal Cortical and Thalamic Connections in the Human Brain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maciej JedynakGrenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, 38000, Grenoble, France. maciej.jedynak@protonmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1876-5485
Anthony BoyerGrenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Blandine Chanteloup-ForêtGrenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Manik BhattacharjeeGrenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, 38000, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8183-1521
Carole SaubatGrenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, 38000, Grenoble, France.
François TadelGrenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, 38000, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5726-7126
Philippe KahaneGrenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, 38000, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1330-3281
Olivier DavidGrenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, 38000, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0776-0216
F-TRACT Consortium

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-21-NEUC-0005-01European Union’s Horizon 2020 Framework Programme for Research and Innovation 945539Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 785907Seventh Framework Programme 616268 F-TRACT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cohort studies of brain stimulations performed with stereo-electroencephalographic (SEEG) electrodes in epileptic patients allow to derive large scale functional connectivity. It is known, however, that brain responses to electrical or magnetic stimulation techniques are not always reproducible. Here, we study variability of responses to single pulse SEEG electrical stimulation. We introduce a second-order probability analysis, i.e. we extend estimation of connection probabilities, defined as the proportion of responses trespassing a statistical threshold (determined in terms of Z-score with respect to spontaneous neuronal activity before stimulation) over all responses and derived from a number of individual measurements, to an analysis of pairs of measurements.Data from 445 patients were processed. We found that variability between two equivalent measurements is substantial in particular conditions. For long ( > ~ 90 mm) distances between stimulating and recording sites, and threshold value Z = 3, correlation between measurements drops almost to zero. In general, it remains below 0.5 when the threshold is smaller than Z = 4 or the stimulating current intensity is 1 mA. It grows with an increase of either of these factors. Variability is independent of interictal spiking rates in the stimulating and recording sites.We conclude that responses to SEEG stimulation in the human brain are variable, i.e. in a subject at rest, two stimulation trains performed at the same electrode contacts and with the same protocol can give discrepant results. Our findings highlight an advantage of probabilistic interpretation of such results even in the context of a single individual.

Indexed as

ElectrocorticographyEpilepsyBrainBrain MappingElectric StimulationElectroencephalographyHumansBrain atlasConnectivity mappingCortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEP)Single pulse electrical stimulation (SPES)Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG)

Identifiers

PMID36520342
PMCPMC9834344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.